uima-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Klügl <pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de>
Subject Re: Ruta additional extensions
Date Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:04:13 GMT
Yep, I've checked after I sent my email.

Peter

Am 03.12.2014 19:29, schrieb Marshall Schor:
> svn is sick - see http://status.apache.org/
>
> it's been sick a while: scroll down a bit on that page and see the svn commit
> activity drop to 0 about maybe 16 hours ago.
>
>
> -Marshall
> On 12/3/2014 9:57 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> The svn commit failed. I gonna try it again later.
>>
>> Am 03.12.2014 15:45, schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>> Am 03.12.2014 15:00, schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>> Unfortunately, the builder overrides the extensions with the provided
>>>> ones in the workbench.
>>>>
>>>> I can change this if you want. However, it would also be reasonable to
>>>> investigate why the extension is not added anyway...
>>> Was just a minimal change. If you work on the current trunk, you can
>>> give it a try.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>> Am 02.12.2014 16:57, schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>> Hmmm, I have to check it (tomorrow) ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 02.12.2014 16:53, schrieb Silvestre Losada:
>>>>>> I have it in descriptor folder however ruta workbench is not using
that
>>>>>> file. would it be possible that ruta workbench has another one?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2 December 2014 at 16:24, Peter Klügl <pkluegl@uni-wuerzburg.de>
wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> should be in the descriptor folder of the ruta project
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 02.12.2014 16:03, schrieb Silvestre Losada:
>>>>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Could you tell me where is located BasicEngine.xml templated?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2 December 2014 at 13:42, Peter Klügl <pkluegl@uni-wuerzburg.de>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> there are two types of extension, one for the analysis
engine and one
>>>>>>>>> for the workbench.
>>>>>>>>> The second takes care that the descriptor contain references
to the
>>>>>>>>> first one.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Provides the editor syntax highlighting for your new
action?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you have a plugin in the workbench that provides an
Eclipse extension
>>>>>>>>> for the extension point org.apache.uima.ruta.ide.actionExtension?
>>>>>>>>> I wonder why the extension is part of the classpath at
all if the
>>>>>>>>> configuration parameters are not updated.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The descriptors are replaced when the script file is
saved. There is no
>>>>>>>>> direct way to avoid the overwriting. If you do not want
to take care of
>>>>>>>>> the Workbench stuff at all, you could probably also just
add the
>>>>>>>>> extension to the BasicEngine.xml (it's the template for
the descriptors)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 02.12.2014 13:15, schrieb Silvestre Losada:
>>>>>>>>>> I created new UIMA action using the languages extension
>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>> https://uima.apache.org/d/ruta-current/tools.ruta.book.html#ugr.tools.ruta.language.extensions
>>>>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>>>>>> In file descriptor generated by ruta workbench I
had to added to
>>>>>>>>>> configuration parameters in additiionalExtensions
section. The
>>>>>>> extension
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> working properly, however ruta workbench overwrites
the file descriptor
>>>>>>>>>> sometimes and I loose that configuration.  Is there
any way to
>>>>>>> configure
>>>>>>>>>> Ruta workbench to avoid overwriting the file descriptor?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>
>>


Mime
View raw message