Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4C4DC820 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36407 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2014 13:26:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 36359 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2014 13:26:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 36347 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2014 13:26:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:26:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eaepstein@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.173] (HELO mail-vc0-f173.google.com) (209.85.220.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:26:45 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id im17so3881367vcb.32 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 05:25:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HIrTJc7tA5g+WbFXNg19E9gK/To2ZCq3CeLzeUOyNNk=; b=roS6VwKHqrcyHqkFR/QzM8IXu5b5es7OLmo947pS3GGxOy5GKPus4JngyP6yk0bB6S HTCE8HsAf1HDWGxEuLREbd+E5eWPrUQ2fDjyCQF5zqpW7f0rCahVd8vlAP1zhzgA9whE 2QINzmi9z7kJn0fkmlRQJF1H8harStr4em6crqr+FRXI4AuQFX8Dps0nypD37eS5pwXQ OgLbzwuj0J9XjF53GWjN7wq2/34Pk6AekpWYj4rezTpbXA/GSMoJFajitgmyl2Mbbu48 yR3RvnnZg464izuHQXti+8thp/LveMOknYAr6Qt6o2Dvk58uPO05s7YYQHB3SowbIflv zcxQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.84.4 with SMTP id h4mr26335257vcl.60.1417353939921; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 05:25:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.245.3 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 05:25:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <546A68FF.1000602@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 08:25:39 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DUCC doesn't use all available machines From: Eddie Epstein To: user@uima.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d23961c310b0509136e17 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b5d23961c310b0509136e17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Simon Hafner wrote: > I've thrown some numbers at it (doubling each) and it's running at > comfortable 125 procs. However, at about 6.1k of 6.5k items, the procs > drop down to 30. > 125 processes at 8 threads each = 1000 active pipelines. How CPU cores are these 1000 pipelines running on? --047d7b5d23961c310b0509136e17--