Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE37511B10 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57720 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2014 16:00:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 57679 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2014 16:00:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 57665 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2014 16:00:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:00:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [141.35.1.28] (HELO mailout0.rz.uni-jena.de) (141.35.1.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:00:05 +0000 Received: from mailsmtp1.rz.uni-jena.de (mailsmtp1.rz.uni-jena.de [141.35.1.18]) by mailout0.rz.uni-jena.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7MG04iJ013966 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:00:04 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-jena.de; s=dkim-2013; t=1408723204; bh=uHCuDXPaiIXAaH5DuBJ/THbXm83H+mHWsSviIiq6byw=; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Mime-Version:Subject: Message-Id:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To; b=i6566hgHsIyMcxLhOCY70kwCBUPGaoHRgGabMsAFKu2b1e807WnzSyk1C6fjhYJei /Q9klTuh/NCJd7IqNdBihfIKXn/uRuFWam/WO3Wuro+78fCZ7xZlp5XFK8uWcRJXT8 4GpbptHjK6iQvoDBkF4rbMg43t3JQgLpKFIb8WLAd+znuJLvVYSBP6eFd2TSzzk0ZF xMIhnc1yozSrH3tswNXd8x2DRt8m54dLnlU0l7jvZRry5Mi+gWQr+3G7bMxUykiR4a G3ZtOi+c6FzOmPBzC1s8AJb870rJP2Ggigi9xQWCPeG2WIYivr8k7EijrjHkRy8OdE F/mBAmkurDM3g== Received: from [100.98.156.35] ([46.114.2.156]) (authenticated id=si95xub bits=0) by mailsmtp1.rz.uni-jena.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7MFxa1f028841 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:59:59 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: =?utf-8?Q?Erik_F=C3=A4=C3=9Fler?= Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: AW: Lucas Message-Id: <317F1011-4213-4F13-A6E6-FB6D2EDC1C8E@uni-jena.de> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:33:51 +0200 References: <53F74764.40306@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53F74764.40306@gmail.com> To: "user@uima.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11D257) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I am using LuCas in production in the last SNAPSHOT version that can be fou= nd in the SVN but not in the maven repository. I was also not aware a patch w= ould be required to get it to work, I am using it in its current SVN state, i= ncluding the splitter filter. I would be willing to help with a migration and contribute to discussions/pl= ans. However, I won't have time to do it all on my own, especially since I u= se it as a bridge to Solr/ElasticSearch that kind of remedies the version di= fference. Thus I use it with newer Solr/ES versions without problems so far.= I will be on vacations for two weeks, after that I'd be available for contri= butions. Best, Erik > On 22 Aug 2014, at 15:36, J=C3=B6rn Kottmann wrote: >=20 > It would probably nice to migrate those to the current versions of Lucene/= Solr. >=20 > J=C3=B6rn >=20 >> On 08/13/2014 08:44 AM, Armin.Wegner@bka.bund.de wrote: >> Hi Renauld, >>=20 >> that's nice, thank you. Are you using Lucene 4.x or an older version? >>=20 >> It's a while ago, that I've asked that question and I didn't get much res= ponse. Is the project dead? Is it just to easy to code a simple annotator fo= r Lucene or Solr to justify the effort maintaining Lucas and Solrcas? >>=20 >> Cheers, >> Armin >>=20 >>=20 >> -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Renaud Richardet [mailto:renaud.richardet@epfl.ch] >> Gesendet: Montag, 11. August 2014 23:12 >> An: user@uima.apache.org >> Betreff: Re: Lucas >>=20 >> Hi Armin, >>=20 >> I used it a while ago. I had to apply the following patch to make it work= : >> https://gist.github.com/renaud/bc34a48ca22f787f6c11 >>=20 >> HTH, Renaud >>=20 >>=20 >>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:55 PM, wrote: >>>=20 >>> Hi! >>>=20 >>> Is someone using Lucas? It seems to be slightly outdated. It depends >>> on Lucene 2.9.3. Lucene is at version 4.9.0 right now. Is there an alter= native? >>>=20 >>> Regards, >>> Armin >>=20 >> -- >> Renaud Richardet >> Blue Brain Project PhD candidate >> EPFL Station 15 >> CH-1015 Lausanne >> phone: +41-78-675-9501 >> http://people.epfl.ch/renaud.richardet >=20