Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2F0010094 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:19:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65069 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2013 15:19:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 64994 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2013 15:19:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 64977 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2013 15:19:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:19:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of steven.bethard@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.42] (HELO mail-oa0-f42.google.com) (209.85.219.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:19:35 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i18so1813441oag.29 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:19:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gLZ0rxsl3T2jdCYDrQcXig7ris+4vgGCc+RyHEA4XmA=; b=QQ/1FXQjls/5FUiB0n1mU94QIqd86dDXKC1YYl64vvvy0erBxmygjoifKznIwfN8MW 55z3lg3NYqmcaYCx0O7r+Z5Wa52u9rSXbWvhCHTnfReurgwidUOmfKBb81tni/AMPVLd o2opwsfQ0AbPzD3V414exbqpANd5bL74q4AdMDFxpbLr266NDZZ7UWCmva5zSwy+cQ+k WmIqn+yED3pM3cFSUc8U5DIJQXxTHngdyFBYgHvXJEk8+35lXRzKactRW0esHIMk73Wf NTxdQ3Wds7Chq962Df/xzbuUdTAHFkbhp2kr7qyIasnKh5pVWyace/zoBPFMYraYhOV/ Lfsg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.23.103 with SMTP id l7mr739997igf.14.1375283954310; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.92.10 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:19:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51F52528.3010209@schor.com> References: <51F52528.3010209@schor.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 09:19:14 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Java level prerequsite upgrade? From: Steven Bethard To: user@uima.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: > The UIMA developers would like to be able to start using Java 6 language > features; of course this would require users to be running this level or later. > > Currently, we require only Java 5 or later. > > Java 5 from various vendors is either past end-of-life or approaching it > (meaning no updates, unless you have some special contracts). > > See http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html or > http://www.ibm.com/software/support/lifecycle/ > > If we started requiring Java 6 or later, would this be an issue for you? ClearTK is considering bumping our required version to Java 7 in the near future (https://code.google.com/p/cleartk/issues/detail?id=354) so we're definitely okay with UIMA requiring Java 6. Steve