Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 945BA46BE for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 11:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58557 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 11:30:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 58413 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 11:30:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 58403 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 11:30:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 11:30:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gcaug-uima-user@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.12] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 11:29:56 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJOeb-0000Y4-8s for user@uima.apache.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:29:33 +0200 Received: from 84.88.76.136 ([84.88.76.136]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:29:33 +0200 Received: from j+asf by 84.88.76.136 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:29:33 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: user@uima.apache.org From: Jens Grivolla Subject: Cas Editor: group annotation types by namespace? Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 13:29:18 +0200 Lines: 14 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.88.76.136 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 Hi, I was wondering if it wouldn't be more useful to group annotation types in the "mode" and similar menus by namespace rather than inheritance. I don't think most users care much about supertypes, and mostly don't know about them, whereas the namespace seems to me to be a more natural way to organize the menus. I think a flat top level with all used namespaces would work quite well, and the submenu with the annotation type names would not need to include the prefix. What do you think? Jens