uima-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Eckart de Castilho <eckar...@tk.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Subject Re: Cas Editor: group annotation types by namespace?
Date Tue, 10 May 2011 08:13:14 GMT
For a technically-oriented user, the package names are probably better. But for a linguist
or knowledge-engineer, I am pretty sure that the inheritance hierarchy is more interesting.
One dives down to the particular level one to which he can still make a distinction and then

I think it would be good to offer both approaches, maybe on different key-bindings and/or
different sub menus reachable from the context menu.


Am 10.05.2011 um 09:55 schrieb Jörn Kottmann:

> On 5/9/11 1:29 PM, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>> I think a flat top level with all used namespaces would work quite 
>> well, and the submenu with the annotation type names would not need to 
>> include the prefix.  What do you think?
> I think your proposed solution is good, because it works for simple and 
> complex type system, where
> the current solution is really limited when we have complex type 
> hierarchies.
> Any other opinions?
> Jörn

Richard Eckart de Castilho
Technical Lead
Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab 
FB 20 Computer Science Department      
Technische Universität Darmstadt 
Hochschulstr. 10, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany 
phone [+49] (0)6151 16-7477, fax -5455, room S2/02/B117
Web Research at TU Darmstadt (WeRC) www.werc.tu-darmstadt.de

View raw message