Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-uima-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 11102 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2007 14:05:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2007 14:05:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 55533 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2007 14:05:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-uima-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 55518 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2007 14:05:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact uima-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: uima-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list uima-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 55509 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2007 14:05:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:05:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of marc.light@thomson.com designates 163.231.12.68 as permitted sender) Received: from [163.231.12.68] (HELO mailout-tlr.thomson.com) (163.231.12.68) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 14:05:29 +0000 Received: from mailout-tlr.thomson.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout-tlr.thomson.com (Switch-3.2.2/Switch-3.2.0) with ESMTP id l78E55pO000997 for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:05:06 GMT Received: from tlrusmneagfe04.ERF.THOMSON.COM (tlrusmneagfe04.erf.thomson.com [163.231.22.131]) by mailout-tlr.thomson.com (Switch-3.2.2/Switch-3.2.2) with ESMTP id l78E54uX000973 for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:05:05 GMT Received: from TLRUSMNEAGMBX18.ERF.THOMSON.COM ([163.231.30.216]) by tlrusmneagfe04.ERF.THOMSON.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:04:56 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Moving to Java 1.5? Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:04:55 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <46B9B3D6.5000202@gmx.de> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Moving to Java 1.5? Thread-Index: AcfZteBzBmrYxObOT9y6/lPXSpRkFAADyuLw References: <46B9B3D6.5000202@gmx.de> From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Aug 2007 14:04:56.0166 (UTC) FILETIME=[196C4860:01C7D9C5] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We would welcome a move to 1.5. Marc =20 -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Goetz [mailto:twgoetz@gmx.de]=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 7:15 AM To: uima-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Moving to Java 1.5? Hi all, our upcoming (hopefully very soon) 2.2 release will still be Java 1.4 compatible. We're currently having a discussion on the development list if for the next version, we should move to Java 1.5. This would mean that future UIMA versions would no longer be able to run in Java 1.4, but would require 1.5 or newer. Java 1.4 is getting quite long in the tooth, and most people have moved. Java 1.5 brought many changes and improvements which we would like to be able to exploit in UIMA. So my question is: would this cause major headaches for anybody around here? Anybody still committed to Java 1.4 for the foreseeable future? The corresponding uima-dev mail thread is here: http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev%40incubator.apache.org/msg03860.htm l --Thilo