uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Burn Lewis <burnle...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 1.0.0 RC10
Date Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:10:43 GMT
Downloaded binary tarball
verified  md5sum
installed on our small test cluster
ran a try3 consisting of 30 jobs & APs

[X] +1 OK to release



On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Lou DeGenaro <lou.degenaro@gmail.com>wrote:

> Download and unzipped binary tarball
> Installed on uima-ducc-vm.apache.org following instructions for "Install
> WebServer Demo" on wiki @
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/UIMA/DUCC#DUCC-t2
> Ran 1.job
>
> Also, followed notes to run with simulated agents
> Ran 1.job
> Registered and started a service
>
> All OK.
>
> [X] +1 OK to release
>
> See it live @ http://uima-ducc-vm.apache.org:42133
>
> Lou.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <uimaee@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Downloaded and unzipped source tarball - OK
> > Built from source - OK
> > Ran 1.job - OK
> >
> > Based on RC9 testing and the above:
> >
> > [X] +1 OK to release
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Downloaded artifacts, did spot checking on signatures - OK
> > >
> > > Compared binary download to rc9 - only found time stamp diffs, and the
> 1
> > > change
> > > in the ducc.properties file for ducc.agent.launcher.cgroups.enable.
> > >  READMEs,
> > > LICENSE/NOTICE compared the same.
> > >
> > > Compare of sources for rc9 / rc10 show only the ducc.properties change,
> > > too.
> > >
> > > built from source - OK
> > >
> > > Based on this and the previous RC9 checking,
> > >
> > > [X] +1 OK to release
> > >
> > > -Marshall Schor
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message