Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-uima-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-uima-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A5E7DCD4 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85171 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2012 14:56:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-dev-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 84995 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2012 14:56:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 84948 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2012 14:56:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:56:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eaepstein@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.175] (HELO mail-ie0-f175.google.com) (209.85.223.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:56:29 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c13so13781277ieb.6 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:56:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=b5YaGBEXW9HPAve9iUp3qD3eIJ/Jy9RnKTDLpw2gD6g=; b=NzlM3Jfi3syRkSQsxww6fc9pAMKXFb8gXMroQLr5mpuNbHjMJIHbKVbFQcAn39vTf7 QHG5dfQPvA87pJs/LpxSFUNFT2CP3TRiEVUqmy/jscscE7/Fjal+tokiM6Wv+BJh43RC WBMHYRNyBozwzp8e6ZNK8d+kcLOUTM4H0IYuodsR+anNWPwMFiYXaCYHm4apBCeIcZtj X/hdqGZF0wq30wxCedWFrhiHdDKwHndD2vlgXSjfJkSZ+XD5JFCU+L6tkB4GwBT42s9w 15Stzlj7O//OH4n6mP4IMidq+pEexrge3Or9EbCNQXJtCsLBr2H1TFxSnMheChnZf4tO RI3A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.185.195 with SMTP id fe3mr5083462igc.25.1350572168986; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:56:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.58.135 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:56:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <507FC23A.90002@gmail.com> References: <507CD4C4.5040100@schor.com> <507FAE85.7040603@gmail.com> <507FB853.1040103@gmx.de> <507FC23A.90002@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:56:08 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] DUCC contribution to the UIMA sandbox From: Eddie Epstein To: dev@uima.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We cannot put the code on Jira until going thru the process of getting full legal approval to do so. We waited to raise the subject on uima-dev until being sure the process would succeed. Very close to finishing now and then will put the code on Jira. Eddie On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:47 AM, J=F6rn Kottmann wrote= : > On 10/18/2012 10:05 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: >> >> On 18/10/12 09:23, J=F6rn Kottmann wrote: >>> >>> On 10/16/2012 05:30 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: >>>> >>>> Marshall, I believe the next step is to send the Software Grant to >>>> Apache. >>>> Can you help with this? >>> >>> Is there a chance to have a look at the code before the grant is >>> signed/registered? >>> If possible it would be nice if you could open a jira issue and attach >>> it to it. >>> >>> J=F6rn >> >> Yes, I was wondering what everybody was voting on. I just >> thought I'd missed the mail with the link to the code. > > > Yeah, some here, also thought the mail must be somewhere > and just voted, because I really would like to investigate better > ways to run my UIMA pipelines on my cluster. Anyway the release > votes are the important ones. > > J=F6rn >