uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jaroslaw Cwiklik <uim...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] uimaFIT contribution to the UIMA sandbox
Date Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:37:33 GMT
+1

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Peter Kl├╝gl <pkluegl@uni-wuerzburg.de>wrote:

> +1
>
> Peter
>
> Am 18.10.2012 17:15, schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
>
>  Hello everybody,
>>
>> after some delay due to hardware breakdown, OS upgrade, etc., I'd like to
>> continue bringing the uimaFIT contribution process further along.
>>
>> Thank you for your comments to UIMA-2470.
>>
>> The comments raise no blockers towards the contribution of the staging
>> package [1] as is, only several suggestions on changes that need to be made
>> eventually as part of the contribution process. One vote was cast towards
>> the contributing the staging packages as is and perform the suggested
>> changes after the contribution. I also think that would be preferable to
>> maintain a clear legacy trace.
>>
>> So I'm going to test my luck and call for a formal vote now.
>>
>> I'm asking if you will please VOTE on bringing uimaFIT via the prepared
>> staging package [1] into the Sandbox, after we get a software grant for it.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the contribution
>> [ ] 0  Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Veto the contribution (please explain why)
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> -- Richard
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/UIMA-2470<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2470>
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message