uima-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Klügl (JIRA) <...@uima.apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (UIMA-2475) eclipse p2 update site instead of old-style update site
Date Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:51:03 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13473193#comment-13473193

Peter Klügl commented on UIMA-2475:

Thanks Steven. I am also interested in this issue. The build process of the TextMarker IDE
with the pom-first approach is working, but not straightforward at all. Therefore, I am still
thinking of switching to Tycho, and a p2 repository could maybe solve my remaining problems

If nobody else volunteers, then I would give it a try (next week). Any objections?
> eclipse p2 update site instead of old-style update site
> -------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: UIMA-2475
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2475
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Eclipse plugins
>            Reporter: Steven Bethard
> The UIMA Eclipse update site (www.apache.org/dist/uima/eclipse-update-site) is an Eclipse
3.3 (or older) update site. Since Eclipse 3.4, the recommended update site layout is p2:
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2_Getting_Started_for_Releng#Why_should_I_make_changes_to_adopt_p2.3F
> I've been bitten by this update site issue because old-style update sites make it impossible
to resolve build-time dependencies when building Eclipse plugins:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=380438#c3
> Could the UIMA update site be modernized to the p2 layout?

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

View raw message