Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-uima-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 38852 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2007 13:50:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Apr 2007 13:50:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 38270 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2007 13:50:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-uima-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38250 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2007 13:50:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact uima-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: uima-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list uima-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38241 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2007 13:50:26 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:50:26 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lally.adam@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.237 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.237] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.237) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:50:18 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id j2so1323527nzf for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:49:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=fGP2dlOlOiQ/fIivuBN0DZc8F4LSzp250aXnrOtZdsvYy5TE2k5FQo5QCl8XfL5FlLs/6OGhGVcZa/2+/t9Roe5VsDM8cVS+DZBlbKCYEJBwiQBxuaNmj5yiqJtqKErj1brd9meR+hUH9Ixa8Vf0bmT2YzUgPTpBEcVQOi3wGCM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=b1PLPaxJM2lkWpXeTIGVEhoYsAr6GYdBLLnR5OjAIuVjmS3cfQ0fMM0kjiR9cIBUhYt6CVTbtFAixQq+WL/GSP70XNZptx46LTM0Tu/RfhSTHXL02+EnC39zATNAROlAXfCtX5XqXdSyLRcG2ZaXRZfqX5D/X+p16qjaLDG3ZAw= Received: by 10.114.181.1 with SMTP id d1mr801429waf.1176731397704; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.102.2 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2787e08a0704160649m1ebde7cfsd0ca536ee3f7dd12@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:49:57 -0400 From: "Adam Lally" Sender: lally.adam@gmail.com To: uima-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Installer in UIMA Apache In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1820b4bbe7695b26 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 4/15/07, Benjamin Sznajder wrote: > Hi, > > I used until now the IBM UIMA (from watson's site) and I am passing now to > the Apache version. > I permit myself to suggest the following: > In IBM version, the user was able to download the installer that made for > him all the work. Why there is not such utility in Apache's version, namely > an installer that would set the desired property values? > Primarily this is because InstallShield is not free, and now that we're at Apache we prefer using freely available tools to build our distribution. There might be a free alternative we could try (I haven't looked), but it doesn't seem to be common among Apache projects to provide an installer. > In addition, I think that there is no clear information about how to > install the UIMA Sdk. In fact, there is no real intuitive place where the > user can find this information. It is only said "by the way" in the > documentation. > The README is intended to provide this information. Is there any important information that you could not find there? > And a last question: why is the README file (in the zip) with no suffix ? > Why .txt is not suitable? > It seemed to be a common Apache convention, although it's not an absolute rule and some other projects do use .txt. I don't feel strongly about it either way. Anyone else have an opinion? -Adam