tvm-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Zhi <>
Subject Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC][Relay] Feature Manager (#3236)
Date Fri, 24 May 2019 01:10:45 GMT
Yes, I agree this is annoying. It looks we might need to introduce some metadata for a pass.
Usually when we do sequential passes, we may need to consider about preserving information
from the updated passes and also validate if we can proceed. We should think about it more
when we start resolving pass dependency and tackling phase ordering. How do you guys think?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, 7-Bit, 0 bytes)
View raw message