From dev-return-91-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@tvm.apache.org Wed Apr 3 01:58:31 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DE93180668 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 03:58:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 71189 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2019 01:58:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tvm.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@tvm.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tvm.apache.org Received: (qmail 71177 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2019 01:58:29 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 01:58:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 27850C2AD8 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 01:58:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.901 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.washington.edu Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NEu8shBcq6UO for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 01:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com (mail-wr1-f42.google.com [209.85.221.42]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 53952624BA for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 01:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id j9so19075427wrn.6 for ; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 18:58:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.washington.edu; s=goo201206; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aIVgs3N7MjzP1eu4SjuU6PIyO3VvXkiXPu6CGt1f9fc=; b=YXLASrUc7VdJ4CXdiH/20H279CXGXRQHuv6ZsdM+6ksN5z7DlA2MUycHLonsKj/dn6 LHt4S0swFTvZHC0a3pihv/xXL+sg7GaGlBM37JTbJTky0uApVJZXhTSYF/GssUeOohnU wBYcS0G8zifRSXsUJAaZm9d7fr/fqfSMDWbFo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=aIVgs3N7MjzP1eu4SjuU6PIyO3VvXkiXPu6CGt1f9fc=; b=tKmLyYUDmbDZwMIEHjG4SgmJ5cvTHm3ERbGCgkY2pWGceL8jJsTpaFZVH89DjHefdI ViEMLvP+0IFxGJCjYje2nd1bwAdUIktkplESYOdFuNgEz+JPg2iOhHm2SXWf6jFsdnSC qtEMZwgSRK2dYpmRsC7hEVcx/D3wqeXhQBjdA76PQuCLCYVMpByTVBnu5D6EmDww1aAv VPQWrdUtj02ss8K17cDLD8cVeAQE157czzpLEC9CUS+EXz0OilrJTlBwul5upqP+rJYp icvVKPSQeZydmxekdZrCqdhcNXsDfNM8cIHCTUvYTmTkOgmYDa9NxUOfmstbcfpKEgWi OynQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVglZkpzxfmNv5uNeZUGCEPHuiova2v8lTwOWLx7e+OeEsG+osz DV9CRQs2Umm5naTJ6YsXDMnv/NUFlv6OUgi/AR3Ex/9i X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx1AVZDOfJzxpzLB7fkGunWnYQchLZzBbi17MbeZ3zEDvswCLsY61Sr5ETgZrqn5x9pmiG5V+SbZnOXsvPwD7s= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5188:: with SMTP id k8mr47155326wrv.183.1554256705591; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 18:58:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jared Roesch Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 18:58:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC] Relay C++ Frontend (#2685) To: dev@tvm.apache.org, "dmlc/tvm" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d3d85405859696e6" --000000000000d3d85405859696e6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I think we should consider it, I think having the tuner sit in Python is okay the more important bit being the schedules and other compiler pieces in C++ for integrating the compiler. I talked with some PyTorch people today and they suggested a Python free version of the compiler would be important if they use it in JITing. - Jared On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 4:28 AM Lianmin Zheng wrote: > Should we open an RFC to discuss how to port autotvm and topi to c++? > > -- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/2685#issuecomment-478954829 --000000000000d3d85405859696e6--