tvm-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tianqi Chen <>
Subject Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC] Register Relay VM design (#2915)
Date Wed, 27 Mar 2019 21:02:16 GMT
Thanks for the proposal. I think we can use more discussion here. To make progress, it is good
trying to divide the argument by points, so we can agree on that. 

For example, so instead of saying: register vm allows data flow discovery, but dataflow discovery
don't have to be done at the VM level. We break it into two points:

- 1) Register vm allows easier dataflow discovery
- 2) Dataflow parallel discovery can be done at a higher or lower level and do not have things
to do with VM

In our case, most people can agree on (1) but not necessarily (2). This way, we can find what
we actually agree on more and move on from that point. I do think we should aim to have only
one version of VM after we agree on things. Mainly because it is a better way to have the
community pushing for a consistent technical direction.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, 7-Bit, 0 bytes)
View raw message