Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tuscany-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tuscany-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F90010725 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 23:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20293 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2013 23:46:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tuscany-user-archive@tuscany.apache.org Received: (qmail 20262 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2013 23:46:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@tuscany.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@tuscany.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@tuscany.apache.org Received: (qmail 20255 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2013 23:46:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 23:46:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of enjoyjava@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.44] (HELO mail-pa0-f44.google.com) (209.85.220.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 23:46:28 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id jh10so1445899pab.3 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:46:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:x-mailer; bh=48hIrgEGEsL3Kb6SW3nUDA6eSSgWoyQziQ70ZWN5oYU=; b=qBU4bUH5IkIrp8k4B5G/3wlw4xYnJDr9/bIg4PtoQfZ8mZDfcziSImYB6u5kIePMVv cFfmojtQV284qHjjoFWKBg8Lgw89b1IRQs1RGFDBPI2h1EUTjd/iONRs3xNc03pmPrxd BrY08j+FpXHz/1VdNhsLsv9JDpS5Ife+el6+5A49dVTuxU8aKbRMrjMbG1BMMn7mi4VJ 71JxfWMaGMiRqq6gM8Q3utIEe4qL4dQRx3TLWbzZ2fq2z8dJrzJFn4vpzGVryFpBP1CV SdgHtFzczoYU/2/Vg00sqUIB9yaL8I2uuJWSFSlAokDIe03O9ZOQSt0J3TXiz40Y550u Cqiw== X-Received: by 10.67.10.236 with SMTP id ed12mr665779pad.153.1375314368393; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:46:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.11] (c-24-5-169-24.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.169.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ai6sm282438pad.15.2013.07.31.16.46.04 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:46:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Raymond Feng Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_48B5B16D-CFE4-49D3-999C-60B4D8A4DB23" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: Still Alive? Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:46:02 -0700 References: <1374350963.87057.ezmlm@tuscany.apache.org> <47790481-B983-4D47-8CE8-07B7A5132E62@gmail.com> <10311BA5-D54A-4DC1-A478-49ADC021B776@gmail.com> <4FAEEC9327E3C74DAFF4B28A8786BFC79B676E95@mail02> To: user@tuscany.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4FAEEC9327E3C74DAFF4B28A8786BFC79B676E95@mail02> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail=_48B5B16D-CFE4-49D3-999C-60B4D8A4DB23 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Glad to hear that.=20 FYI, my former employer has Tuscany in production for a few days now. Thanks, Raymond On Jul 31, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Kallen McInerney = wrote: > We=92ve been using Tuscany 2.0 in production for almost 18 months now. = It was fairly painless to integrate and performed well so we never = really had to engage the community. > =20 > From: Akhil Anil [mailto:akhil.karun@gmail.com]=20 > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 9:18 PM > To: user@tuscany.apache.org > Subject: Re: Still Alive? > =20 > Hi Sajjad, > =20 > At my workplace, we've implemented Tuscany very recently (just few = months back). IMHO Tuscany is very mature and tested. You wont be = ruining your application.=20 > =20 >=20 > On 29 July 2013 23:20, Luciano Resende wrote: > =20 > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Sajjad Daya = wrote: >=20 > > Hi Guys > > > > I'm writing to inquire if Tuscany is still alive, and most = importantly, is it still relevant? > > > > =46rom the Tuscany site, I see many references to 2007, and 2008, = but not so much after that. > > > =20 > Mature projects are less active than new projects which what you see = today in Tuscany.=20 > =20 > > I am about to start a new SOA project for the cloud, and want to = know if I should use Tuscany for my services, or is there something new = that has caught the interests of Tuscany patrons? > > > =20 > There are several companies utilizing Tuscany as of today, and they = have seen little issues with the current functionality. If you need new = stuff (e.g. new bindings, etc), then you might be prepared to help, and = we will be here to guide. > =20 > > As you can imagine, I'm quite concerned about having a large part of = our application depend on a technology, that appears to have been = abandoned. So any guidance or assistance you can provide would be very = helpful. > =20 > Agree with you, see comments above.=20 > =20 > > > > Thank you for your help! > > Sajjad >=20 >=20 >=20 > =20 > --=20 > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >=20 >=20 > =20 > -- > =20 > Thanks and regards.... >=20 > May God Bless us! >=20 > AkH!L. > =20 > http://akhilspassion.blogspot.com --Apple-Mail=_48B5B16D-CFE4-49D3-999C-60B4D8A4DB23 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Glad = to hear that. 

FYI, my former employer has = Tuscany in production for a few days = now.

Thanks,
Raymond

= On Jul 31, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Kallen McInerney <kallenm@marketamerica.com>= ; wrote:

We=92ve been using Tuscany 2.0 in production for almost = 18 months now.  It was fairly painless to integrate and performed = well so we never really had to engage the = community.

 

From: Akhil Anil = [mailto:akhil.karun@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 29, = 2013 9:18 PM
To: user@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Re: Still = Alive?

 

Hi Sajjad,

 

At my workplace, we've implemented Tuscany very recently (just few = months back). IMHO Tuscany is very mature and tested. = You wont be ruining your application. 

 

On 29 July 2013 23:20, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com> = wrote:

 

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Sajjad Daya <sajjad.daya1@gmail.com> = wrote:


> Hi Guys
>
> I'm writing to inquire if Tuscany is still alive, and most = importantly, is it still relevant?
>
> =46rom the Tuscany site, I see many references = to 2007, and 2008, but not so much after that.
>

 

Mature projects are less active than new projects which what you = see today in Tuscany. 

 

> I am about to start a new SOA project for the cloud, and = want to know if I should use Tuscany for my services, or is there = something new that has caught the interests of Tuscany patrons?
>

 

There are several companies utilizing Tuscany as of today, and they have = seen little issues with the current functionality. If you need new stuff = (e.g. new bindings, etc), then you might be prepared to help, and we = will be here to guide.

 

> As you can imagine, I'm quite concerned about having a = large part of our application depend on a technology, that appears to = have been abandoned. So any guidance or assistance you can provide would be very = helpful.

 

Agree with you, see comments = above. 

 

>
> Thank you for your help!
> Sajjad




 

--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/



 

--

 

Thanks and = regards....

May God Bless = us!

AkH!L.

 


= --Apple-Mail=_48B5B16D-CFE4-49D3-999C-60B4D8A4DB23--