Return-Path: 
 <user-return-7044-apmail-tuscany-user-archive=tuscany.apache.org@tuscany.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-tuscany-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-tuscany-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 447DB785C
	for <apmail-tuscany-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:33:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 51913 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2011 22:33:26 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-tuscany-user-archive@tuscany.apache.org
Received: (qmail 51880 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2011 22:33:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@tuscany.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@tuscany.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@tuscany.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@tuscany.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.tuscany.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@tuscany.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@tuscany.apache.org
Received: (qmail 51873 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2011 22:33:25 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:33:25 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of luckbr1975@gmail.com designates
 209.85.161.181 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.161.181] (HELO mail-gx0-f181.google.com)
 (209.85.161.181)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:33:20 +0000
Received: by ggnr1 with SMTP id r1so5384261ggn.26
        for <user@tuscany.apache.org>; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:32:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=bxa+d2TDCyb+8tfAgYeztTa10z6YoJmdcLmzlAKV9sE=;
        b=KlyUgC5SWyV735/eoTWx6lGCm1+NPHNICunDfLiUZfW8Y+g8+tGP65d4diTgega8Sk
         4locGFRq4pMKTkVGM2OFwgLSrabT1Cfk1Z2awthaQON6vxKCSmRqgF2l+RVkzUOEYOnZ
         KAgptWYtWmeyJ0DOh3RWhaVPYPMi2uqFoJRl8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.222.7 with SMTP id qi7mr10516375obc.43.1322260379365; Fri,
 25 Nov 2011 14:32:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.14.103 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:32:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4ECE22FC.3020003@aps-prevoyance.fr>
References: <4ECE22FC.3020003@aps-prevoyance.fr>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 23:32:59 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAGU5spcn1vjWEeGs7860Xh=N2rcm9LnV8xHfNgVRLPMfz8EBVA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Default WS port - Tuscany 2 runtime
From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
To: user@tuscany.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Antonio De Berardis
<antonio.de-berardis@aps-prevoyance.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about web service binding, for example:
>
> <component name=3D"HelloworldComponent">
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 <implementation.java class=3D"sample.HelloworldImpl"/>
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 <service name=3D"Helloworld">
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 <binding.ws/>
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 </service>
> </component>
>
> When I deploy this component in a webapp on Tomcat, It publishes a servic=
e
> at http://localhost:8085/HelloworldComponent/Helloworld. The
> =E2=80=9Clocalhost:8085=E2=80=9D seems to be a default value.
>
> I actually have lots of Tuscany based webapps with many components in the=
m,
> therefore all publishing their webservices at http://localhost:8085/...
>
> One way to change that is to set the uri attribute in binding.ws. , which
> means that if I want to relocate my webservices in the future I will have=
 to
> change the URI in each and every one of my webapps.
>
> Is there a way to set a default "Host:Port"? I'm using the tuscany.war
> deployed on Tomcat, is there may be a way to do this in the Tomcat=E2=80=
=99s conf or
> in Tuscany.war?
> Or if not, what do you think is better to do? Let binding.ws with no URI =
or
> define it in each WS? Am I missing something? Are you planning to change
> this behavior?
>
> Best Regards.
>
> Antonio
>

We recently did a little workaround to allocate ports, particularly
for test environments, in [1], where you can define your own
implementation which can choose ports based on a property file, or
environment variable.

I'm starting to think that it would be a good idea to be able to add
support for some basic macro resolution/expansion to pieces of the
composite (e.g. properties to be resolved based on contents of a
external file which would allow you to reuse existent configuration to
resolve hostnames, etc)

[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/hos=
t-http/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/host/http/extensibility/HttpPor=
tAllocator.java

--=20
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/