Mailing-List: contact tuscany-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of
 prvs=bert.robben=725799c63@agfa.com designates 134.54.1.77 as permitted
 sender)
In-Reply-To: <46AE04D8.1020304@apache.org>
From: bert.robben@agfa.com
To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: SDO To POJO transformation and viceversa
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: 
 <OFB52E8CF1.03928718-ONC1257329.0021B52D-C1257329.0029E59E@agfa.com>
Sender: bert.robben@agfa.com
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:37:45 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

We have an implementation that actually performs this. It is not based on 
Tuscany SDO, but on our own inhouse developed sdo implementation. We are 
willing to contribute that to the open source community though. But don't 
get your hopes up yet; at the moment it is not yet out-of-the-box usable 
with Tuscany.

See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1493

Basically we don't use SDO's everywhere because (1) we have tons of legacy 
code that is very hard to change and (2) we sometimes need to map 
different objects on the same Data Object (typical case is an object which 
is stored in two different databases and is structurally almost the same, 
but not entirely).

Bert


Jean-Sebastien Delfino <jsdelfino@apache.org> 
30/07/2007 17:33
Please respond to
tuscany-user@ws.apache.org


To
tuscany-user@ws.apache.org
cc

Subject
Re: SDO To POJO transformation and viceversa


Surendran, Vinoth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I believe this would be common requirement for projects involved in the
> lines of SCA , We are looking for a Transformation classes which would
> make life simpler by transforming from SCA SDO to Java POJO and Vice
> versa . 
>
> Where in our environment is WebSphere Process Server v6.0.2 
>
> 
>
> Thanks & Regards
>
> Vinoth
> 

Life would be even simpler if you didn't have to transform :)

Can you tell us a little bit more about your use case?
- What are you using SDOs for? are you using SDOs to produce XML 
documents?
- What are you using the POJOs for? why can't you just use the SDOs 
instead?
- How different are your SDOs from POJOs? which codegen options are you 
using for your SDOs?
- what do your POJOs look like? POJO is an overloaded term :) simple 
JavaBeans? any special types like collections with generics? vectors, 
maps? any base classes?

Thanks.

-- 
Jean-Sebastien


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-user-help@ws.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-user-help@ws.apache.org