tuscany-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "kelvin goodson" <kelvingood...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Tuscany SDO M2 candidate distribution
Date Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:44:19 GMT
I have just posted to the tuscany-dev mailing list to indicate the
availablity of an RC1a distribution based on your comments Ron,  thanks
again.

Regards, Kelvin.



On 23/09/06, Ron Gavlin <rgavlin@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Kelvin,
>
> Thanks for your hard work putting together an RC1 distribution with both
> source and binaries. A few thoughts...
>
> 1. For the binary distribution, I didn't see the sdo tools and plugin
> classes. I would suggest each appear in a separate jar similar to how M1
> was packaged. So, there would be one binary zip with the suite of
> dependent jars plus individual jars for sdo-spec, sdo-impl, sdo-tools,
> and sdo-plugin.
>
> 2. For the source distribution, I found having two files named using
> sdo-impl and sdo-spec confusing. The confusion is due to the fact that
> sdo-impl truly means the sdo-impl component/project for the binary
> distribution but for the source distribution, sdo-impl really means
> sdo-impl + sdo-tools + sdo-plugin. In order to avoid such confusion, I
> would suggest you provide one source zip file containing source for
> sdo-spec, sdo-impl, sdo-tools, and sdo-plugin. I think this is clearer
> and more consistent.
>
> Thanks again,
>
> - Ron
>
> kelvin goodson wrote:
> > I posted a proposal to tuscany-dev a couple of days back
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg08105.html
> >
> > So my plan is to crank the handle on SDO Java and when its looking
> > good enough to post release candidates,  I'll make them available on
> > people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson as has been done before for our C++
> > releases.
> >
> > Regards, Kelvin.
> >
> > On 21/09/06, Jeremy Boynes <jboynes@apache.org> wrote:
> >> On Sep 21, 2006, at 8:32 AM, Ron Gavlin wrote:
> >>
> >> > Kelvin,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the update. Do you plan to make a "release candidate"
> >> > source distribution? If so, do you plan to make it in the same time
> >> > frame as the binary one?
> >> >
> >>
> >> I'm not sure what Kelvin is thinking here but for SCA I was not
> >> planning on doing this until we had a real "release candidate" -
> >> defined as being things that we were actually prepared to vote on.
> >>
> >> In the run up to that point I would build SNAPSHOT binary distros
> >> based on "allegedly good" SVN revisions - the corresponding source
> >> distro would be the content of the tree as of that revision.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jeremy
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-user-help@ws.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-user-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-user-help@ws.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message