On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Thomas Gentsch <email@example.com> wrote:
On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 10:38 -0800, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Thomas Gentsch <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Great! Papers from the C++11 standard work groups are available onShortly looked through it, definitely interesting. Of course that makes
> open-std.org there . The final ISO standard is not free but the
> last draft  is free. If you just want a high level overview
> there's one on Wikipedia . Hope that helps.
me worry a bit how far compilers support this already ... particularly
as partially maybe (as in our case) older OS versions are to be
I quickly looked into Jira and found at least these:
Oh!!! Actually I always believed Tuscany is mainly about SDO!
> The C++ trunk has already gone through some refactoring and quite a
> few changes over time since M3... There's no SDO anymore
Well, then I have to correct myself - we are using Tuscany C++ SDO. I
wasn't aware of this at all (haven't looked into it for a while though)
Well, if SDO is dead anyway then there will not be any release anymore I
> (like the Java trunk, which I believe dropped SDO as well), the
> composite files use the new SCDL from OASIS, the runtime integrates
> with Apache HTTPD, etc. There's still an integration with Axis2C but
> I've not looked at it for a very long time.
> So, if you're still using SDO you'll probably want to stick to the M3
> level, but I can help apply your patch to a maintenance branch off M3
> at some point if that helps.
suppose, so maybe no need to bother.
OK, then I should look into the alternatives? Is there any replacement?
Many thx + regards,