Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tuscany-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tuscany-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7DE5953B for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 03:29:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35964 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2012 03:29:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tuscany-dev-archive@tuscany.apache.org Received: (qmail 35814 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2012 03:29:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tuscany.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@tuscany.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tuscany.apache.org Received: (qmail 35796 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2012 03:29:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 03:29:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nirmal070125@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.181] (HELO mail-iy0-f181.google.com) (209.85.210.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 03:29:10 +0000 Received: by iaoo28 with SMTP id o28so6842273iao.26 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:28:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vUOMkMo+nOmF0F6bjbjZZowX+QURGAuOHPlAZ5YokMs=; b=b6bAj5fYagU7Ib6vaY5An89M1VEoeSY/NxL8QDfqLREz7kVtOpdYNaRsFeLFgamOno 1m9dZoySIrHgfSIBlfBjIcZQNXjrIN//Fl1baGdiIW5ctNZhx2lz3CLSc17ICpsjWCly NVDS475wAUexz0CBb6e9I3gPNC3R3VD2r9PrCi1a+mt9DS87X9RmaxH1clU7+Z27Zsgj xzGOtDPv0Jy/du+uiDJWFAeEbuE9Xkjk/Y0HIeNupPtuEHU4l1KAZnYc4T5PU8Gtw+e8 /1Cz1VGXPXtyHK6xjA+kJ17SGMkLpjXnFs/WW9n1wd7s/0kAtxNmU7CBF7oyEA0GL2Ro xr0Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.159.228 with SMTP id xf4mr16710744igb.0.1331522929091; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:28:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.115.197 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:28:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:58:49 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-Beta4 RC1 From: Nirmal Fernando To: dev@tuscany.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340ba332e45404bb035793 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --14dae9340ba332e45404bb035793 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Also shouldn't Release note be changed? http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta4-RC1/RELEASE_NOTES On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > Hi Ant, > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:19 AM, ant elder wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Luciano Resende >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:48 AM, ant elder wrote: >> >> Here's the release vote for RC1 of the 2.0-Beta4 artifacts, please >> >> review and vote. >> >> >> >> You can find the staged artifacts at: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta4-RC1/ >> >> >> >> and the SVN tag for the release at: >> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta4-RC1/ >> > > The SVN command (svn log -r 1151792:HEAD > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta4) in > the changes file should be corrected to svn log -r 1151792:HEAD > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta4-RC1 > > Isn't it? > > >> >> >> ...ant >> > >> > >> > Seems good, source distribution builds from a clean repo, run RAT and >> > things seems fine. >> > >> > +1 >> > >> >> Thanks Luciano. +1 from me too. >> >> ...ant >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Nirmal > > C.S.Nirmal J. Fernando > Software Engineer, > WSO2 Inc. > > Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/ > > -- Best Regards, Nirmal C.S.Nirmal J. Fernando Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/ --14dae9340ba332e45404bb035793 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Also shouldn't Release note be changed? http://people.apache.or= g/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta4-RC1/RELEASE_NOTES

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nirmal Fernando <nirmal070125@gmail.com>= wrote:
Hi Ant,

On Mon, Mar 12,= 2012 at 3:19 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote= :
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:48 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Here's the release vote for RC1 of the 2.0-Beta4 artifacts, pl= ease
>> review and vote.
>>
>> You can find the staged artifacts at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta= 4-RC1/
>>
>> and the SVN tag for the release at:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tusc= any/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta4-RC1/

The SVN command (svn log -r 1151792:HEAD https:= //svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta4) in the = changes file should be corrected to svn log -r 1151792:HEAD https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0= -Beta4-RC1

Isn't it?

>>
>> =A0 ...ant
>
>
> Seems good, source distribution builds from a clean repo, run RAT and<= br> > things seems fine.
>
> +1
>

Thanks Luciano. +1 from me too.

=A0 ...ant



--
Best Regards,
Nirmal
C.S.Nirmal J. Fernando
Software Engineer,
WSO2 Inc.



--
Best Rega= rds,
Nirmal

C.S.Nirmal J. Fernando
Software Engineer,
WSO2 = Inc.


--14dae9340ba332e45404bb035793--