tuscany-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Laws <simonsl...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Issue with policy intents and shared implementations
Date Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:26:53 GMT
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Simon Laws <simonslaws@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Brent Daniel <brenthdaniel@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Simon,
>>
>> I've been operating with basically the same set of changes locally and
>> things do seem to work fine.
>>
>> From a design perspective, the unshared model seems like a better
>> alternative to me. I'm sure there are performance gains from not
>> having to do annotation processing, etc, multiple times, but these
>> could probably be achieved with caching elsewhere.
>>
>> Brent
>>
>
> Ok, Brent. Lets go with it for the time being and see how hangs
> together.  If you have improvements in your changes over what I added
> feel free to go in and fix it up.
>
> Simon
>
> --
> Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
> Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
>

And I forgot to add that I'm still seeing some residual issues in the
way that appliesTo is processed. I think because the applies to
processing is based on reference and services where it should really
be based on endpints and endpoint references.

Simon

-- 
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com

Mime
View raw message