tuscany-dev mailing list archives: February 2011

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Re: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED)
Scott Kurz   Re: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 03:14
Simon Nash     Re: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 08:55
Scott Kurz       Re: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 15:14
Simon Nash         Re: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 18:04
Simon Nash           Re: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 20:22
Yang, Gang CTR US USA             RE: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 21:42
Simon Nash               Re: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Wed, 02 Feb, 08:33
Simon Nash                 Re: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Wed, 02 Feb, 09:17
Simon Laws                   Re: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Wed, 02 Feb, 09:57
Yang, Gang CTR US USA       RE: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 16:36
Scott Kurz         Re: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 17:35
Yang, Gang CTR US USA           RE: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 17:43
Simon Nash             Re: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 18:10
Simon Nash               Re: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Wed, 02 Feb, 12:17
Yang, Gang CTR US USA                 RE: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Thu, 03 Feb, 22:52
Simon Nash                   Re: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 11:03
Simon Nash         Re: An issue with Axis2 WS binding dispatcher - the dispatching mechanism does not support SOAP message body encryption (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 17:41
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2
Mike Edwards   Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 07:50
Mike Edwards   Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 09:13
Simon Laws     Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 09:26
ant elder       Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 10:18
ant elder     Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 09:39
ant elder   Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 09:34
Florian MOGA     Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 09:50
ant elder       Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 09:53
Florian MOGA         Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 09:59
ant elder           Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 10:05
Florian MOGA             Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 10:17
ant elder               Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 12:52
Florian MOGA       Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 10:22
Mike Edwards   Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 13:43
ant elder     Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 13:55
Mike Edwards       Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 14:07
ant elder         Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 14:16
Mike Edwards           Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 15:40
ant elder             Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Tue, 01 Feb, 20:21
ant elder               Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Wed, 02 Feb, 09:04
Mike Edwards                 Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Wed, 02 Feb, 09:43
Simon Laws                   Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Wed, 02 Feb, 11:03
Florian MOGA                     Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Wed, 02 Feb, 12:24
Florian MOGA                       Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Wed, 02 Feb, 18:42
ant elder                         Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Fri, 04 Feb, 08:51
Florian MOGA                           Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Fri, 04 Feb, 09:13
Florian MOGA                             Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Fri, 04 Feb, 11:55
ant elder                               Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Sat, 05 Feb, 09:20
Florian MOGA                                 Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Sat, 05 Feb, 09:51
Mike Edwards                                   Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Mon, 07 Feb, 08:38
ant elder                   Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Wed, 02 Feb, 18:30
Mike Edwards                     Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2 Thu, 03 Feb, 14:17
Re: Reduce default logging output in 2.x
ant elder   Re: Reduce default logging output in 2.x Tue, 01 Feb, 11:22
Florian MOGA Conversational state in 2.x Tue, 01 Feb, 13:12
Mike Edwards   Re: Conversational state in 2.x Tue, 01 Feb, 14:03
Florian MOGA     Re: Conversational state in 2.x Tue, 01 Feb, 15:20
Florian Moga       Re: Conversational state in 2.x Fri, 11 Feb, 20:58
Re: An issue with PolicyHandler extension framework - a bug or design flaw? (UNCLASSIFIED)
Simon Nash   Re: An issue with PolicyHandler extension framework - a bug or design flaw? (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 15:58
Yang, Gang CTR US USA     RE: An issue with PolicyHandler extension framework - a bug or design flaw? (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 17:16
Simon Nash       Re: An issue with PolicyHandler extension framework - a bug or design flaw? (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 17:59
Yang, Gang CTR US USA         RE: An issue with PolicyHandler extension framework - a bug or design flaw? (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 18:22
Simon Nash           Re: An issue with PolicyHandler extension framework - a bug or design flaw? (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 01 Feb, 19:31
Simon Nash             Re: An issue with PolicyHandler extension framework - a bug or design flaw? (UNCLASSIFIED) Wed, 02 Feb, 07:39
Yang, Gang CTR US USA               RE: An issue with PolicyHandler extension framework - a bug or design flaw? (UNCLASSIFIED) Thu, 03 Feb, 21:30
Simon Nash                 Re: An issue with PolicyHandler extension framework - a bug or design flaw? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 13:06
Luciano Resende (JIRA) [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-3479) Pass-by-reference with the Node/SCAClient getService proxy Tue, 01 Feb, 22:41
Re: svn commit: r917777 - /tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/binding-sca-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/sca/provider/RuntimeSCAReferenceBindingProvider.java
Luciano Resende   Re: svn commit: r917777 - /tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/binding-sca-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/sca/provider/RuntimeSCAReferenceBindingProvider.java Tue, 01 Feb, 22:43
Mike Edwards     Re: svn commit: r917777 - /tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/binding-sca-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/sca/provider/RuntimeSCAReferenceBindingProvider.java Tue, 01 Feb, 22:52
Luciano Resende       Re: svn commit: r917777 - /tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/binding-sca-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/sca/provider/RuntimeSCAReferenceBindingProvider.java Tue, 01 Feb, 23:50
Raymond Feng     AllowsPassByReference support Tue, 01 Feb, 22:53
Mike Edwards       Re: AllowsPassByReference support Tue, 01 Feb, 23:07
Raymond Feng         Re: AllowsPassByReference support Tue, 01 Feb, 23:33
Luciano Resende         Re: AllowsPassByReference support Tue, 01 Feb, 23:46
ant elder           Re: AllowsPassByReference support Wed, 02 Feb, 00:07
Raymond Feng             Re: AllowsPassByReference support Wed, 02 Feb, 00:25
ant elder               Re: AllowsPassByReference support Wed, 02 Feb, 00:47
ant elder       Re: AllowsPassByReference support Wed, 02 Feb, 00:59
Simon Nash (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3824) Incorrect WSDL generated for bare parameter style Wed, 02 Feb, 08:43
Simon Laws (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3826) Have to build all samples before running individual samples from maven as we don't publish the sample parent pom Wed, 02 Feb, 10:43
Simon Laws (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3825) Improve usability of samples Wed, 02 Feb, 10:43
Simon Laws (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3827) Documentation location Wed, 02 Feb, 10:47
Simon Laws (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3828) Where possible employ default/consistent mechanism for running samplke contributions Wed, 02 Feb, 11:01
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3829) Test Failure whe building trunk - iTest WS Launcher Axis2 testscases all fail Wed, 02 Feb, 11:05
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-3829) Test Failure whe building trunk - iTest WS Launcher Axis2 testscases all fail Wed, 02 Feb, 11:11
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3829) Test Failure whe building trunk - iTest WS Launcher Axis2 testscases all fail Wed, 02 Feb, 11:57
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-3829) Test Failure whe building trunk - iTest WS Launcher Axis2 testscases all fail Wed, 02 Feb, 11:57
Sebastian Millies (JIRA) [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-3830) SDO problem: No escaping of special characters during (un)marshalling Wed, 02 Feb, 17:37
Sebastian Millies (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3830) SDO problem: No escaping of special characters during (un)marshalling Wed, 02 Feb, 17:37
Simon Laws Tuscany 20 SPI checking Thu, 03 Feb, 11:47
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3817) Tuscany fails OASIS Java CAA Testcases 10029 & 10030 Thu, 03 Feb, 12:48
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3816) iTest Callback SeparateThread violates the OASIS rules for COMPOSITE scope components with Callbacks Thu, 03 Feb, 12:50
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3831) Tuscany fails OASIS compliance test BWS_2016 Thu, 03 Feb, 12:54
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-3831) Tuscany fails OASIS compliance test BWS_2016 Thu, 03 Feb, 13:02
Yang, Gang CTR US USA Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Thu, 03 Feb, 19:11
Simon Nash   Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Thu, 03 Feb, 21:27
Yang, Gang CTR US USA     RE: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Thu, 03 Feb, 22:37
Simon Nash       Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 11:17
Yang, Gang CTR US USA         RE: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 14:45
Simon Nash           Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 15:40
Yang, Gang CTR US USA             RE: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 16:24
Simon Nash               Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 17:00
Simon Laws                 Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 17:03
Yang, Gang CTR US USA                 RE: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 17:28
Raymond Feng                   Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 17:42
Yang, Gang CTR US USA                     RE: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 19:01
Simon Laws                       Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 09:33
Simon Nash                         Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 10:26
Simon Laws                           Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 11:02
Simon Nash                             Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 11:44
Simon Laws                               Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 13:33
Simon Nash                                 Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 15:43
Simon Laws                                   Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 16:51
Simon Nash                                     Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 17:17
Yang, Gang CTR US USA                                 RE: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 16:47
Simon Laws                                   Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 16:59
Simon Nash                                   Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 18:08
Yang, Gang CTR US USA                                     RE: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 19:58
Simon Nash                                       Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 21:21
Yang, Gang CTR US USA                                         RE: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 22:10
Simon Nash                                           Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 23:17
Yang, Gang CTR US USA                                             RE: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Tue, 08 Feb, 14:41
Simon Nash                   Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 10:40
Simon Laws                     Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 11:04
Simon Laws         Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 14:46
Simon Nash           Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 15:32
Yang, Gang CTR US USA             RE: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 16:49
Simon Laws               Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 17:00
Yang, Gang CTR US USA                 RE: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 17:24
Simon Nash                 Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 10:35
Simon Laws                   Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 11:03
Simon Nash                     Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Mon, 07 Feb, 11:39
Yang, Gang CTR US USA           RE: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) Fri, 04 Feb, 16:03
Scott Kurz another issue with bare->wrapped data transform: the MediatorImpl.copyInput Thu, 03 Feb, 23:25
Scott Kurz (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3832) Invocation chain may run through Mediator copyInput after DataTransformationInterceptor has already transformed data Fri, 04 Feb, 05:09
Scott Kurz (JIRA) [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-3832) Invocation chain may run through Mediator copyInput after DataTransformationInterceptor has already transformed data Fri, 04 Feb, 05:46
Florian MOGA 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Fri, 04 Feb, 10:36
Simon Laws   Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Fri, 04 Feb, 10:57
Florian MOGA     Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Fri, 04 Feb, 11:39
ant elder   Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sat, 05 Feb, 09:58
Florian MOGA     Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sat, 05 Feb, 10:45
ant elder       Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sat, 05 Feb, 11:03
Simon Nash         Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sat, 05 Feb, 14:10
Florian MOGA           Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sat, 05 Feb, 14:44
ant elder             Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sat, 05 Feb, 18:44
Florian MOGA               Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sat, 05 Feb, 20:58
Simon Nash                 Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sun, 06 Feb, 11:32
ant elder                   Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sun, 06 Feb, 11:48
Florian MOGA                     Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sun, 06 Feb, 12:50
Simon Nash                       Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sun, 06 Feb, 14:44
ant elder                         Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sun, 06 Feb, 18:07
Florian MOGA                           Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sun, 06 Feb, 18:44
Simon Nash                           Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sun, 06 Feb, 22:36
ant elder                             Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sun, 06 Feb, 22:47
Simon Nash                               Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 07 Feb, 08:51
Simon Laws                                 Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 07 Feb, 10:42
Florian Moga                                   Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 07 Feb, 11:04
ant elder                                     Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 07 Feb, 12:09
ant elder                                 Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 07 Feb, 12:05
Mike Edwards                                   Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 07 Feb, 13:33
ant elder                       Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 07 Feb, 19:13
Florian Moga                         Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 07 Feb, 20:43
Florian Moga                           Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 07 Feb, 20:57
ant elder                             Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Wed, 09 Feb, 09:16
Florian Moga                             Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Wed, 09 Feb, 09:16
ant elder                           Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Tue, 08 Feb, 08:39
Florian Moga                             Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Tue, 08 Feb, 11:09
ant elder                               Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Tue, 08 Feb, 12:58
Simon Laws                                 Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Tue, 08 Feb, 13:26
ant elder                                   Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Tue, 08 Feb, 19:18
Florian Moga                                     Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Tue, 08 Feb, 20:04
ant elder                                       Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Wed, 09 Feb, 09:08
ant elder                                     Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Thu, 10 Feb, 09:10
Florian Moga                                       Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Thu, 10 Feb, 10:36
ant elder                                         Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Fri, 11 Feb, 08:54
Simon Nash                                           Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Fri, 11 Feb, 09:24
ant elder                                             Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Fri, 11 Feb, 10:17
ant elder                                               Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Fri, 11 Feb, 10:28
Simon Nash                                                 Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Fri, 11 Feb, 11:57
ant elder                                                   Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Tue, 15 Feb, 19:05
Simon Nash                                                     Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Wed, 16 Feb, 10:04
Simon Nash                                               Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Fri, 11 Feb, 11:54
ant elder                                       Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Tue, 15 Feb, 19:08
ant elder                                         Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Tue, 15 Feb, 19:37
ant elder                                         Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Sun, 20 Feb, 08:35
Simon Laws                                           Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 21 Feb, 10:52
ant elder                                             Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Wed, 23 Feb, 08:46
Simon Laws                                               Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Wed, 23 Feb, 08:55
Florian Moga                                               Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Wed, 23 Feb, 09:07
Florian Moga                                                 Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Wed, 23 Feb, 09:20
ant elder                                                   Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Wed, 23 Feb, 13:02
Florian Moga                                                     Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Wed, 23 Feb, 13:14
Simon Laws                                                       Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Thu, 24 Feb, 11:53
Florian Moga                                                         Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Thu, 24 Feb, 14:28
Simon Nash                                                           Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Thu, 24 Feb, 15:58
ant elder                                                             Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 28 Feb, 07:59
Mike Edwards                                                           Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 28 Feb, 13:06
ant elder                                             Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 28 Feb, 08:07
Simon Laws                                               Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 28 Feb, 09:39
ant elder                                                 Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 28 Feb, 09:58
Mike Edwards                                                   Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 28 Feb, 13:04
ant elder                                                     Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 28 Feb, 15:24
Simon Laws                                                       Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2) Mon, 28 Feb, 16:26
Florian Moga (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3833) launcher-embedded-jse integration test hanging intermittently on RMI contribution Fri, 04 Feb, 10:50
Florian Moga (JIRA) [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-3833) launcher-embedded-jse integration test hanging intermittently on RMI contribution Fri, 04 Feb, 10:54
Florian MOGA Tuscany Meetup in London Fri, 04 Feb, 12:46
ant elder   Re: Tuscany Meetup in London Fri, 04 Feb, 15:47
Mike Edwards     Re: Tuscany Meetup in London Mon, 07 Feb, 13:44
Florian Moga       Re: Tuscany Meetup in London Mon, 07 Feb, 13:59
Simon Laws         Re: Tuscany Meetup in London Mon, 07 Feb, 14:44
Simon Nash           Re: Tuscany Meetup in London Mon, 07 Feb, 15:51
Florian Moga             Re: Tuscany Meetup in London Mon, 07 Feb, 16:21
Simon Nash               Re: Tuscany Meetup in London Mon, 07 Feb, 23:39
ant elder                 Re: Tuscany Meetup in London Tue, 08 Feb, 08:58
ant elder                   Re: Tuscany Meetup in London Mon, 14 Feb, 10:29
Giorgio Zoppi                     Re: Tuscany Meetup in London Mon, 14 Feb, 11:01
Mike Edwards                     Re: Tuscany Meetup in London Mon, 14 Feb, 11:14
Simon Nash                       Re: Tuscany Meetup in London Mon, 14 Feb, 13:30
Florian Moga                         Re: Tuscany Meetup in London Mon, 14 Feb, 16:36
Florian Moga                           Re: Tuscany Meetup in London Tue, 15 Feb, 12:39
Simon Nash                             Re: Tuscany Meetup in London Tue, 15 Feb, 14:49
Re: svn commit: r1067646 - in /tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/maven/maven-tuscany-plugin: pom.xml src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/maven/plugin/TuscanyRunMojo.java
Florian MOGA   Re: svn commit: r1067646 - in /tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/maven/maven-tuscany-plugin: pom.xml src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/maven/plugin/TuscanyRunMojo.java Sun, 06 Feb, 12:26
Re: svn commit: r1067728 - in /tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk: ./ modules/web-javascript-dojo/ samples/applications/store-webapp/ samples/applications/store/ samples/learning-more/binding-jsonrpc/calculator-webapp/
ant elder   Re: svn commit: r1067728 - in /tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk: ./ modules/web-javascript-dojo/ samples/applications/store-webapp/ samples/applications/store/ samples/learning-more/binding-jsonrpc/calculator-webapp/ Sun, 06 Feb, 20:19
Luciano Resende     Re: svn commit: r1067728 - in /tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk: ./ modules/web-javascript-dojo/ samples/applications/store-webapp/ samples/applications/store/ samples/learning-more/binding-jsonrpc/calculator-webapp/ Sun, 06 Feb, 20:50
Luciano Resende Dojo 1.5.0 dependency upgrade, was Re: svn commit: r1067728 - in /tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk: ./ modules/web-javascript-dojo/ samples/applications/store-webapp/ samples/applications/store/ samples/learning-more/binding-jsonrpc/calculator-webapp/ Sun, 06 Feb, 20:58
Luciano Resende Issues building Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Distribution Launcher Embedded JSE module Sun, 06 Feb, 23:39
Florian Moga   Re: Issues building Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Distribution Launcher Embedded JSE module Mon, 07 Feb, 08:04
Simon Laws     Re: Issues building Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Distribution Launcher Embedded JSE module Mon, 07 Feb, 10:14
Florian Moga       Re: Issues building Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Distribution Launcher Embedded JSE module Mon, 07 Feb, 10:31
Simon Laws         Re: Issues building Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Distribution Launcher Embedded JSE module Mon, 07 Feb, 10:43
Florian Moga           Re: Issues building Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Distribution Launcher Embedded JSE module Mon, 07 Feb, 10:56
Mike Edwards             Re: Issues building Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Distribution Launcher Embedded JSE module Wed, 09 Feb, 10:08
Florian Moga               Re: Issues building Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Distribution Launcher Embedded JSE module Wed, 09 Feb, 21:44
Simon Laws                 Re: Issues building Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Distribution Launcher Embedded JSE module Thu, 10 Feb, 08:46
Florian Moga                   Re: Issues building Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Distribution Launcher Embedded JSE module Thu, 10 Feb, 08:51
Simon Laws [DISCUSS] Tuscany website on CMS? Mon, 07 Feb, 15:09
Mike Edwards   Re: [DISCUSS] Tuscany website on CMS? Mon, 07 Feb, 23:14
Raymond Feng [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Mon, 07 Feb, 23:35
Simon Nash   Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Tue, 08 Feb, 00:03
Raymond Feng     Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Tue, 08 Feb, 00:25
ant elder       Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Tue, 08 Feb, 09:32
Simon Laws         Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Tue, 08 Feb, 09:56
ant elder           Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Tue, 08 Feb, 10:08
Mike Edwards             Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Tue, 08 Feb, 10:23
Simon Nash               Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Tue, 08 Feb, 11:17
Mike Edwards                 Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Tue, 08 Feb, 13:06
ant elder                 Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Tue, 08 Feb, 13:11
Simon Nash                   Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Tue, 08 Feb, 14:12
Mike Edwards                     Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Tue, 08 Feb, 14:54
ant elder                     Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Wed, 09 Feb, 08:42
Simon Nash                       Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Wed, 09 Feb, 10:56
Mike Edwards                         Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Wed, 09 Feb, 11:01
ant elder                         Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Wed, 09 Feb, 11:14
Simon Nash                           Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Wed, 09 Feb, 11:57
ant elder                             Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Thu, 10 Feb, 08:31
Simon Nash       Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Tue, 08 Feb, 11:02
Simon Nash         Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification Wed, 09 Feb, 08:28
Simon Laws (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3834) Exceptions in application code during @Destroy seem to cause the runtime to stop without trying to stop all of the components Tue, 08 Feb, 15:58
Simon Laws [1.x] exceptions in @Destroy Tue, 08 Feb, 16:09
ant elder   Re: [1.x] exceptions in @Destroy Tue, 08 Feb, 19:01
Simon Laws     Re: [1.x] exceptions in @Destroy Wed, 09 Feb, 08:50
ant elder Tuscany board report due this month Wed, 09 Feb, 07:56
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Jun 20142
May 20141
Apr 20143
Mar 20141
Nov 20137
Oct 201318
Sep 20138
Aug 201311
Jul 201315
Jun 20138
May 20138
Apr 20138
Feb 20136
Jan 20135
Dec 20128
Nov 201225
Oct 20127
Sep 201222
Aug 20122
Jul 201212
Jun 201243
May 201259
Apr 201245
Mar 2012108
Feb 201290
Jan 201253
Dec 201178
Nov 201155
Oct 2011119
Sep 2011143
Aug 2011417
Jul 2011236
Jun 2011224
May 2011196
Apr 2011193
Mar 2011213
Feb 2011372
Jan 2011206
Dec 2010143
Nov 2010283
Oct 2010503
Sep 2010600
Aug 2010277
Jul 2010314
Jun 2010382
May 2010397
Apr 2010245
Mar 2010452
Feb 2010269
Jan 2010483
Dec 2009147
Nov 2009487
Oct 2009729
Sep 2009430
Aug 2009505
Jul 2009548
Jun 2009603
May 2009659
Apr 2009627
Mar 2009604
Feb 2009816
Jan 2009611
Dec 2008531
Nov 2008586
Oct 2008447
Sep 2008624
Aug 2008905
Jul 2008898
Jun 20081126
May 20081032
Apr 20081273
Mar 20081445
Feb 2008990
Jan 2008988
Dec 2007526
Nov 2007814
Oct 2007949
Sep 20071733
Aug 20071694
Jul 20071560
Jun 20071029
May 20071184
Apr 20071040
Mar 20071369
Feb 20071320
Jan 20071292
Dec 2006892
Nov 20061213
Oct 20061570
Sep 20061284
Aug 20061676
Jul 20061234
Jun 2006840
May 20061483
Apr 2006756
Mar 2006709
Feb 2006292
Jan 2006342
Dec 200554