tuscany-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Laws <simonsl...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification
Date Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:56:57 GMT
>
> I can see that relaxing the current spec restrictiveness would be
> difficult as things would break in some circumstances, but it does
> seem like there will be situations when the assembler really knows it
> would be fine but even so they can't get the PBR optimization because
> the impls aren't coded with the @AllowsPassByReference annotation.
> Isn't that a similar situation to where the remotable annotation was
> added to the interface SCDL element, and there could be a similar
> allowsPassByReference attribute added to the service and reference
> SCDL elements?
>
>   ...ant
>

Hi Ant.

Can you say a bit more about the "situations when the assembler really
knows it would be fine"? Reading previous posts to this thread doesn't
convince me that that is the case.

Simon

-- 
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com

Mime
View raw message