tuscany-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Laws <simonsl...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] SCA AllowsPassByReference spec clarification
Date Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:56:57 GMT
> I can see that relaxing the current spec restrictiveness would be
> difficult as things would break in some circumstances, but it does
> seem like there will be situations when the assembler really knows it
> would be fine but even so they can't get the PBR optimization because
> the impls aren't coded with the @AllowsPassByReference annotation.
> Isn't that a similar situation to where the remotable annotation was
> added to the interface SCDL element, and there could be a similar
> allowsPassByReference attribute added to the service and reference
> SCDL elements?
>   ...ant

Hi Ant.

Can you say a bit more about the "situations when the assembler really
knows it would be fine"? Reading previous posts to this thread doesn't
convince me that that is the case.


Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com

View raw message