tuscany-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Raymond Feng <enjoyj...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Node2 vs Node, parallel universes? Sample tuscany launcher shell
Date Thu, 08 Jul 2010 15:31:56 GMT

We had a debate on this topic. See:


And apparently, we didn't reach agreement. 

I think it would be a good idea to agree on the commands for shell. This will help us understand
how users use SCA. Then it can be translated into a set of API/SPIs. Mixing different steps
into one layer could prevent us from seeing the complete user story.

Raymond Feng
Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 7, 2010, at 11:53 PM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> <jsdelfino@apache.org> wrote:
>> I'm confused as you've switched o.a.t.node.NodeFactory to a different
>> o.a.t.node2.NodeFactory. I see 49 references to node.NodeFactory in the
>> source tree, everywhere people need to create nodes. node2.NodeFactory looks
>> like a parallel implementation, with only 3 references, if I'm not mistaken
>> only from this new shell. What happened?
> The domain-node module is new is why its not used much yet and its
> based more closely on the operations described in the Assembly spec. I
> like it, and plan to start using it instead of the old Node APIs now.
> It also supports more than the old Node API so you can do things that
> you otherwise can't.
>> Also this new shell seems to use a single node. It's fine with me if that's
>> what you want to do here, but that's not what I need. What I need is a
>> collection of independent nodes, each loaded with a deployable composite,
>> each with its own lifecycle, like I had in the original code.
> What is that you need a node for? This does give you independent
> deployable composites each with its own lifecycle so whats missing?
> I'm wondering if its just that the current commands and help
> information on them isn't very clear yet so its not so obvious to you
> what this is doing.
>   ...ant

View raw message