tuscany-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Laws <simonsl...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Consistency of location of signing KEYS
Date Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:50:57 GMT
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Simon Laws <simonslaws@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> The file at [1] is required as there are automated scripts that
>>> regularly scan the distribution area to verify that all the
>>> distributed files are correctly signed.
>> hmmm ok,
>>> The copy at [2] could probably
>>> go, Amita never did end up doing a release so her key isn't really
>>> needed.
>> I don't have a problem with leaving Amita's key there it just feels
>> awkward having the file in two places. Having said getting rid of the
>> change tracked version also doesn't seem ideal. Maybe I could create a
>> little synch script that runs now and again to keep the two in step
>> like we do with the web site Anyone think that sounds problematic?
> Can't we have a checkout of KEYS file from SVN to dist ? Or a checkout
> somewhere, and make a link (ln -s) ?
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/

yep, I was looking at
(http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/site/trunk/bin/sync) and
that's the kind of thing that seems to do. Still needs to be run


Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com

View raw message