Mailing list archives: November 2009

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Luciano Resende Tuscany 2.x Documentation Sun, 01 Nov, 16:52
ant elder   Re: Tuscany 2.x Documentation Mon, 02 Nov, 13:16
Luciano Resende     Re: Tuscany 2.x Documentation Mon, 02 Nov, 17:44
ant elder       Re: Tuscany 2.x Documentation Tue, 03 Nov, 10:47
Luciano Resende         Re: Tuscany 2.x Documentation Fri, 06 Nov, 23:51
ant elder           Re: Tuscany 2.x Documentation Sat, 07 Nov, 08:01
Luciano Resende             Re: Tuscany 2.x Documentation Sat, 07 Nov, 16:19
ant elder               Re: Tuscany 2.x Documentation Mon, 09 Nov, 09:16
Luciano Resende                 Re: Tuscany 2.x Documentation Sun, 15 Nov, 16:38
Luciano Resende                   Re: Tuscany 2.x Documentation Mon, 16 Nov, 17:53
Luciano Resende                     Re: Tuscany 2.x Documentation Mon, 16 Nov, 21:49
Re: Moving the otests out from the sca build
Simon Laws   Re: Moving the otests out from the sca build Mon, 02 Nov, 09:36
ant elder     Re: Moving the otests out from the sca build Mon, 02 Nov, 11:01
Simon Laws       Re: Moving the otests out from the sca build Mon, 02 Nov, 13:18
ant elder         Re: Moving the otests out from the sca build Mon, 02 Nov, 13:33
kelvin goodson           Re: Moving the otests out from the sca build Mon, 02 Nov, 13:38
Simon Laws             Re: Moving the otests out from the sca build Mon, 02 Nov, 13:39
Simon Laws           Re: Moving the otests out from the sca build Mon, 02 Nov, 13:43
ant elder         Re: Moving the otests out from the sca build Mon, 02 Nov, 13:39
Simon Laws           Re: Moving the otests out from the sca build Mon, 02 Nov, 13:52
Simon Laws             Re: Moving the otests out from the sca build Tue, 03 Nov, 10:12
ant elder               Re: Moving the otests out from the sca build Tue, 03 Nov, 11:07
Simon Laws                 Re: Moving the otests out from the sca build Tue, 03 Nov, 11:13
ant elder                 Re: Moving the otests out from the sca build Tue, 03 Nov, 11:38
Re: OASIS compliance test status
ant elder   Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 02 Nov, 10:43
ant elder   Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 02 Nov, 11:05
Simon Laws     Re: OASIS compliance test status Tue, 03 Nov, 11:58
ant elder       Re: OASIS compliance test status Tue, 03 Nov, 12:15
ant elder         Re: OASIS compliance test status Tue, 03 Nov, 13:27
Ramkumar R           Re: OASIS compliance test status Wed, 04 Nov, 07:22
Mike Edwards             Re: OASIS compliance test status Thu, 05 Nov, 12:13
Simon Laws               Re: OASIS compliance test status Thu, 05 Nov, 12:30
Simon Laws                 Re: OASIS compliance test status Thu, 05 Nov, 12:44
Mike Edwards                 Re: OASIS compliance test status Thu, 05 Nov, 13:08
kelvin goodson                 Re: OASIS compliance test status Thu, 05 Nov, 13:33
Luciano Resende                   Re: OASIS compliance test status Thu, 05 Nov, 17:44
ant elder                   Re: OASIS compliance test status Fri, 06 Nov, 09:31
Simon Laws                     Re: OASIS compliance test status Fri, 06 Nov, 09:36
Ramkumar R                       Re: OASIS compliance test status Fri, 06 Nov, 11:40
Simon Laws                         Re: OASIS compliance test status Fri, 06 Nov, 11:45
Ramkumar R                           Re: OASIS compliance test status Fri, 06 Nov, 11:59
Simon Laws                             Re: OASIS compliance test status Fri, 06 Nov, 13:14
Simon Laws                               Re: OASIS compliance test status Fri, 06 Nov, 13:31
Simon Laws                                 Re: OASIS compliance test status Fri, 06 Nov, 17:48
ant elder                                   Re: OASIS compliance test status Fri, 06 Nov, 23:30
ant elder                                     Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 09 Nov, 09:09
Ramkumar R                                       Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 09 Nov, 09:11
Simon Laws                                       Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 09 Nov, 10:53
ant elder                                         Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 09 Nov, 11:01
Raymond Feng                                       Intent matching, was: Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 09 Nov, 16:45
ant elder                                         Re: Intent matching, was: Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 09 Nov, 16:54
ant elder                                         Re: Intent matching, was: Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 16 Nov, 16:03
kelvin goodson                       Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 09 Nov, 12:25
Simon Laws                         Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 09 Nov, 12:50
kelvin goodson                           Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 09 Nov, 14:10
Simon Laws                             Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 09 Nov, 14:12
Simon Laws                               Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 09 Nov, 15:25
kelvin goodson                               Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 09 Nov, 15:31
Simon Laws                                 Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 09 Nov, 15:54
kelvin goodson                                   Re: OASIS compliance test status Mon, 09 Nov, 16:15
Ramkumar R                                     Re: OASIS compliance test status Tue, 10 Nov, 09:33
ant elder                                       Re: OASIS compliance test status Tue, 10 Nov, 10:20
Mike Edwards                                         Re: OASIS compliance test status Tue, 10 Nov, 15:02
kelvin goodson                                     Re: OASIS compliance test status Tue, 10 Nov, 12:46
Mike Edwards                                       Re: OASIS compliance test status Tue, 10 Nov, 15:04
kelvin goodson                                         Re: OASIS compliance test status Wed, 11 Nov, 10:10
Simon Laws                                           Re: OASIS compliance test status Thu, 12 Nov, 10:02
Ramkumar R                                             Re: OASIS compliance test status Fri, 13 Nov, 07:48
Simon Laws                                               Re: OASIS compliance test status Wed, 25 Nov, 16:18
Mike Edwards           Re: OASIS compliance test status Thu, 05 Nov, 09:24
ant elder             Re: OASIS compliance test status Thu, 05 Nov, 09:38
Simon Laws               Re: OASIS compliance test status Thu, 05 Nov, 10:07
Mike Edwards               Re: OASIS compliance test status Thu, 05 Nov, 18:39
Mike Edwards               Re: OASIS compliance test status Fri, 06 Nov, 09:04
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC1
ant elder   Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC1 Mon, 02 Nov, 11:18
Raymond Feng     Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC1 Mon, 02 Nov, 16:41
ant elder       Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC1 Mon, 02 Nov, 16:51
Raymond Feng         Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC1 Mon, 02 Nov, 17:13
Raymond Feng         Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC1 Tue, 03 Nov, 00:17
ant elder Adding shaded modules to build aggregated jars of tuscany modules Mon, 02 Nov, 12:47
Raymond Feng   Re: Adding shaded modules to build aggregated jars of tuscany modules Mon, 02 Nov, 21:39
Luciano Resende   Re: Adding shaded modules to build aggregated jars of tuscany modules Mon, 02 Nov, 23:15
ant elder     Re: Adding shaded modules to build aggregated jars of tuscany modules Tue, 03 Nov, 10:44
scatest4       Re: Adding shaded modules to build aggregated jars of tuscany modules Sat, 07 Nov, 12:57
ant elder         Re: Adding shaded modules to build aggregated jars of tuscany modules Tue, 10 Nov, 09:19
scatest4           Re: Adding shaded modules to build aggregated jars of tuscany modules Wed, 11 Nov, 15:21
ant elder             Re: Adding shaded modules to build aggregated jars of tuscany modules Sun, 15 Nov, 07:50
Johnny Simons               Re: Adding shaded modules to build aggregated jars of tuscany modules Mon, 16 Nov, 16:26
Luciano Resende                 Re: Adding shaded modules to build aggregated jars of tuscany modules Mon, 16 Nov, 16:49
ant elder                   Re: Adding shaded modules to build aggregated jars of tuscany modules Tue, 17 Nov, 09:18
ant elder                 Re: Adding shaded modules to build aggregated jars of tuscany modules Tue, 17 Nov, 09:10
Simon Laws [1.x] build failure in 1.5.2 Mon, 02 Nov, 14:23
Simon Laws   Re: [1.x] build failure in 1.5.2 Mon, 02 Nov, 14:43
Simon Laws Re: svn commit: r824234 - in /tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.5.2/modules: binding-atom-abdera/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/atom/provider/ databinding-jaxb/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/databinding/jaxb/ databinding/src/main/java/o Mon, 02 Nov, 14:42
Raymond Feng   Re: svn commit: r824234 - in /tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.5.2/modules: binding-atom-abdera/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/atom/provider/ databinding-jaxb/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/databinding/jaxb/ databinding/src/main/java/o Mon, 02 Nov, 23:34
Simon Laws     Re: svn commit: r824234 - in /tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.5.2/modules: binding-atom-abdera/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/atom/provider/ databinding-jaxb/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/databinding/jaxb/ databinding/src/main/java/o Tue, 03 Nov, 08:10
Luciano Resende DAS Source code location moved in SVN... Mon, 02 Nov, 23:12
Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA) [jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-3341) Tuscany fixes to make ASM_12008 & ASM_12011 Tue, 03 Nov, 11:01
Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3341) Tuscany fixes to make ASM_12008 & ASM_12011 Tue, 03 Nov, 11:01
Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3360) Fixes required to make ASM_12008 work Tue, 03 Nov, 11:03
ant elder [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Tue, 03 Nov, 11:21
Raymond Feng   Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Tue, 03 Nov, 17:23
ant elder     Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Tue, 03 Nov, 17:53
Raymond Feng       Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Tue, 03 Nov, 18:06
Raymond Feng   Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Wed, 04 Nov, 07:16
Simon Laws     Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Wed, 04 Nov, 08:55
Simon Laws       Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Wed, 04 Nov, 12:12
Simon Laws         Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Wed, 04 Nov, 16:10
ant elder         Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Wed, 04 Nov, 16:12
Simon Laws           Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Wed, 04 Nov, 16:17
Simon Laws             Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Wed, 04 Nov, 16:59
Raymond Feng               Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Wed, 04 Nov, 17:34
Raymond Feng         Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Wed, 04 Nov, 17:56
Simon Laws           Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Wed, 04 Nov, 18:01
Simon Laws             Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Wed, 04 Nov, 18:43
Raymond Feng             Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Wed, 04 Nov, 23:04
Raymond Feng         Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Thu, 05 Nov, 01:27
Simon Laws           Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Fri, 06 Nov, 08:45
Simon Laws             Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M4 RC2 Fri, 06 Nov, 08:53
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3337) Tuscany fixes to make ASM_8017 work Tue, 03 Nov, 13:26
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3361) Assmebly test ASM_9999 should be removed Tue, 03 Nov, 14:31
Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3362) Fixes needed to make ASM_12005 work Wed, 04 Nov, 07:15
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-3362) Fixes needed to make ASM_12005 work
Mike Edwards (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-3362) Fixes needed to make ASM_12005 work Thu, 05 Nov, 08:51
Mike Edwards (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-3362) Fixes needed to make ASM_12005 work Thu, 05 Nov, 09:04
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-3362) Fixes needed to make ASM_12005 work Thu, 05 Nov, 09:14
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-3361) Assmebly test ASM_9999 should be removed Thu, 05 Nov, 09:37
Mike Edwards ** PLEASE ** describe the actual problem(s) when raising JIRAs for OASIS test suite testcases Thu, 05 Nov, 10:14
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3294) Support JAX-WS Client Asynchronous API for a Synchronous Service as described in Java CAA Thu, 05 Nov, 10:25
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3289) Illegal annotations in a service interface class Thu, 05 Nov, 10:28
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3221) Intents attached to Composite References are not being resolved (ASM_6032) Thu, 05 Nov, 10:28
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3223) Mutual exclusive intents are not being flaged as errors by the runtime (ASM_6032) Thu, 05 Nov, 10:28
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3295) Service Creation should consider interfaces marked as remotable via SCDL @Remotable attribute in <interface.java> Thu, 05 Nov, 10:28
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3021) schema violation not rejected in ASM_10003_TestCase Thu, 05 Nov, 10:28
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3301) Verify @Property compliance with latest OASIS Java 1.1 draft spec Thu, 05 Nov, 10:28
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3225) ASM_5026_TestCase failed to pass, it can't get the property value Thu, 05 Nov, 10:28
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-3360) ASM_12008 fails due to undeclared XML Namespace prefix in TestComposite5.compsite Thu, 05 Nov, 10:30
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3129) pay heed to "normative guidance on the usage of annotations in unsupported ways" Thu, 05 Nov, 10:30
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3344) Tuscany fixes to make ASM_12012 work Thu, 05 Nov, 10:30
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3306) Problems with JCA_General_POJO Service1WithAsyncMethods.java interface Thu, 05 Nov, 10:30
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-3333) Tuscany fixes to make ASM_6033 work Thu, 05 Nov, 10:52
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-3360) ASM_12008 fails due to undeclared XML Namespace prefix in TestComposite5.compsite Thu, 05 Nov, 10:52
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-3339) Tuscany fixes to make ASM_12003 work Thu, 05 Nov, 11:29
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-3339) Tuscany fixes to make ASM_12003 work Thu, 05 Nov, 11:39
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-3338) OASIS fixes required to make ASM-12003 work Thu, 05 Nov, 11:44
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-3340) OASIS fixes required to make ASM-12004 work Thu, 05 Nov, 12:01
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-3340) OASIS fixes required to make ASM-12004 work Thu, 05 Nov, 12:03
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-3357) Fixes to make ASM_12010 work Thu, 05 Nov, 17:51
Mike Edwards (JIRA) [jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-3357) Fixes to make ASM_12010 work Thu, 05 Nov, 17:53
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Dec 200929
Nov 2009487
Oct 2009729
Sep 2009429
Aug 2009505
Jul 2009548
Jun 2009603
May 2009659
Apr 2009627
Mar 2009604
Feb 2009816
Jan 2009611
Dec 2008521
Nov 2008586
Oct 2008447
Sep 2008624
Aug 2008905
Jul 2008898
Jun 20081126
May 20081032
Apr 20081273
Mar 20081445
Feb 2008990
Jan 2008988
Dec 2007526
Nov 2007814
Oct 2007949
Sep 20071733
Aug 20071694
Jul 20071560
Jun 20071029
May 20071184
Apr 20071040
Mar 20071369
Feb 20071320
Jan 20071292
Dec 2006892
Nov 20061213
Oct 20061570
Sep 20061284
Aug 20061676
Jul 20061234
Jun 2006840
May 20061483
Apr 2006756
Mar 2006709
Feb 2006292
Jan 2006342
Dec 200554