Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tuscany-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2353 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2009 08:33:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2009 08:33:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 68518 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 08:33:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tuscany-dev-archive@tuscany.apache.org Received: (qmail 68472 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 08:33:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tuscany.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@tuscany.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tuscany.apache.org Received: (qmail 68464 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2009 08:33:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:33:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.211] (HELO QMTA11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:33:46 +0000 Received: from OMTA15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.71]) by QMTA11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 5kXD1d0041Y3wxoABkXLwz; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:31:20 +0000 Received: from [10.1.1.58] ([76.126.249.175]) by OMTA15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 5kZS1d0013noLzw8bkZSw6; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:33:26 +0000 Message-ID: <4B010E4C.5050809@apache.org> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:33:16 -0800 From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@tuscany.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure References: <5a75db780909222031o213d3a93j9b7df9a42d606c2f@mail.gmail.com> <71e1b5740909292250s344d51e6lbdda81c2d25f11bf@mail.gmail.com> <5a75db780909301311k28365574ue1ed87bd7dc6fea@mail.gmail.com> <71e1b5740909302309w7dd32d77gfc9136bcbbc2c6e7@mail.gmail.com> <5a75db780910120803y82e43bcobed21e91dfc95dcc@mail.gmail.com> <71e1b5740910130101g338da142ife93304d0414b37b@mail.gmail.com> <5a75db780911101456s45dc1743u2fe7da2b218c2dd2@mail.gmail.com> <5a75db780911111659m382540c5n587d831d00341c22@mail.gmail.com> <5a75db780911122037y7b6e69bexdc5038851445dcb@mail.gmail.com> <4B00521A.2010608@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4B00521A.2010608@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > Luciano Resende wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Luciano Resende >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Luciano Resende >>> wrote: >>>> The SDO and DAS projects are now structured as Tuscany subprojects >>>> >>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/das-java/ >>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sdo-java/ >>>> >>>> I'll start working on the 1.x code base sometime tomorrow PST time and >>>> move all branches and tags. As for the 1.5.2 branch and 1.x branch >>>> (actually trunk) I would like to get a confirmation that nobody have >>>> any big uncommitted changes before I can move it as the 1.x trunk. >>>> >>>> For more details on the proposed changes, see the update SVN Structure >>>> proposal [1] >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+SVN+Structure >>>> >>>> >>> Most of the branches and tags for 1.x and 2.x are now on the new SVN >>> structure >>> >>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-1.x/ >>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/ >>> >>> As I didn't hear back from anyone regarding any big changes in 1.x or >>> 1.5.2 branches, I'll move them to the new structure on Thursday around >>> lunch PST time. >>> >>> >> >> The new SVN structure is mostly in place, except for Natice (CPP) and >> the 2.x trunk. >> It would be good to get some help from the folks working on >> Native(CPP) to get that in place. >> As for the 2.x, when would be a good time to migrate that ? Is this >> weekend a good time ? >> > > OK, I'll try to do the cpp tree if I find some time tonight. > Done. The new structure follows the description on the Wiki [1] and is similar to what has been done for the Java projects: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/das-cpp/ http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-cpp/ http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sdo-cpp/ and under each directory: branches/ tags/ trunk/ I've left a few cpp tags under: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/ I think they can be removed as they're just interim release candidate tags and the final release tags are available in the new structure, if anybody has time to do it later this week... [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+SVN+Structure -- Jean-Sebastien