tuscany-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ant elder <antel...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Tuscany 2.x Documentation
Date Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:47:21 GMT
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:16 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I have noticed that people have started to be more active on writing
>>> 2.x documentation, but they are being scattered all over the different
>>> wikis we have. I'd like to suggest we concentrate in using the 2.x
>>> documentation wiki [1] which is linked from the website as the proper
>>> documentation for 2.x. If there are issues with that, let me know and
>>> I can volunteer to make it better. I will also try to move some of the
>>> existent 2.x contents to the 2.x documentation wiki.
>>> [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYxDOCx2x/Index
>> There are some problems with using the TUSCANYxDOCx2x wiki space. It
>> doesnt seem to get built into the Tuscany website so links have to be
>> to cwiki.apache.org instead of tuscany.apache.org which the cwiki doc
>> says we shouldn't do. It also means that search engines don't index
>> the doc in the cwiki space which i think would really need to be fixed
>> if we're going to use it. And, I dont know how to say it other than
>> just saying it - IMHO TUSCANYxDOCx2x doesn't look very good, i know it
>> was done this way to try to get the automated PDF generation working
>> but its not consistent with the rest of the Tuscany website and it
>> doesn't look great.
>>   ...ant
> This is good feedback, so let me see if I understand it correct :
>  - We need to export it to be accessible via tuscany.apache.org
> - We need to make it look and feel similar to our website scheme.
> How about the navigation style ? My original idea wasn't really about
> the PDF only, but the navigation style that looked more like a
> documentation divided into chapters then just a plain website... I'll
> see if I can apply the feedback above and still maintain the
> navigation style.

I think the main thing is getting it working at tuscany.apache.org.
Once that works it will be easier to see how it looks, and i'd be
happy to help port up the existing 1.x doc to 2.x.


View raw message