Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tuscany.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ant.elder@gmail.com designates
 209.85.218.216 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=TypzcsE/t5QG2bddVmw9j3UgovC31TEGYb2yGtyAvoFWaYZP0p8q6v2hP9qsolpRGF
         vFi/KwiKv4slVeyWy6XiVYVg0Rwkp2KqpxPb5TLMVddJQJBV+Y2oZ06O80ChCCDW+leT
         URACw983TLDHizxwrD93MRB6x6oy2gHm5Oy8g=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: antelder@apache.org
In-Reply-To: <c0c051b50909300337j2003ad0asaed80eaa99625940@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c0c051b50909300337j2003ad0asaed80eaa99625940@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:49:43 +0100
Message-ID: <71e1b5740910010049j3af076f5ld1254d20ebf693fd@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [2.x] reviewing/summarizing domain operation - was: Re:
	Discovery-based SCA Domain for OSGi RFC 119
From: ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com>
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Simon Laws <simonslaws@googlemail.com> wrote:

> b3/ one or more composite files but which are present in
> META-INF/sca-deployables (is this still supported?)
>

No, i think i took out support for that earlier on in 2.x when porting
from 1.x, there may be a ML thread. Something like that still seems
like a good idea to me though to make it seem easy to create a simple
contribution. I'd quite like the spec people to extend the application
composite concept in the JEE spec to the Assembly spec so you can have
something like application composite with a standard name in a regular
contribution like you can have a web.composite in a .war contribution.
I guess we could add support for that to Tuscany and see what the spec
people think of it?

  ...ant