Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tuscany.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of luckbr1975@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.223.176 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=DiglwTpRGQaIAT0JAIqt+Y5Iys55w7uF/7rJFgS3DjTrybY9ToshJAxQPrnnyhh8BL
         qWV4vwhy4pIpNa7yRkqXtflGJs2KOD99eOFtRtSvGGBPF5a+ylXq5xhDX2kTvzbvp2oN
         6h1rnXj5P7quYthotx+SQF4cQJifRI4NeFAa8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E70B79DFD2F44FF991A6673BBAEC3A92@rfengt61p>
References: <5a75db780909222031o213d3a93j9b7df9a42d606c2f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c0c051b50909231023p1568d11fs918b8803d40eed86@mail.gmail.com>
	 <98410DEB2D2E428A9B2651F22963E9AE@rfengt61p>
	 <5a75db780909231446nf4bd33ere4a3fa49ac9239c2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4ABDACD8.6060304@apache.org>
	 <5a75db780909261044v787e0bm48fab41d799da5a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <71e1b5740909292250s344d51e6lbdda81c2d25f11bf@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5a75db780909301311k28365574ue1ed87bd7dc6fea@mail.gmail.com>
	 <71e1b5740909302309w7dd32d77gfc9136bcbbc2c6e7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <E70B79DFD2F44FF991A6673BBAEC3A92@rfengt61p>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:03:23 -0700
Message-ID: <5a75db780910120803y82e43bcobed21e91dfc95dcc@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Cc: antelder@apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Raymond Feng <enjoyjava@gmail.com> wrote:
> Who are the people that blindly check out our source code without reading
> our web sites or mailing list? Do we reference the svn directories in our
> releases?
>
> If people find a svn directory doesn't exist any more, they can just simply
> do one of the following:
>
> 1) Check our web site (We should add a "Source Code" to left panel on our
> home page)
> 2) Browse http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany (The proposed new
> subfolders are self-explanatory).
> 3) Ask on the Tuscany dev or user ML
>
> If we like the new structure technically, let's do it. +1 from me.
>


Looks like various people were in agreement to clean up our SVN
structure to make things a little more organized and bring related
resources together. I was thinking if we could do this and be ready
for ApacheCon (sometime before end of the month)...

Thoughts ?

-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/