Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tuscany-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60730 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2009 21:00:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2009 21:00:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 99165 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 21:00:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tuscany-dev-archive@tuscany.apache.org Received: (qmail 99098 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 21:00:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tuscany.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@tuscany.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tuscany.apache.org Received: (qmail 99090 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2009 21:00:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:00:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of luckbr1975@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.187] (HELO mail-iw0-f187.google.com) (209.85.223.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:00:23 +0000 Received: by iwn17 with SMTP id 17so191731iwn.10 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:59:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vARXBjyLWVE1AlxdFZvH+s3d0S+Y21XXd5aNEqa6J9g=; b=ZT2q8aQhJsOMHvBr8Eby2cs+mBVDpfdTMEeRuq35wSakE9I39s3oihm5fQHdzBsZD4 0mhVWczJkmAjx4xyBYP9ec3j87ByU3pkEWyRLO/gWf/uVa17N7yABmLIK4FBlEFpgcyc xp26DKgfppl/NGPQCuRw32fQZ4EtvsMe4y3U8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MfWaIs2bh82TojZLRU/o09Bdodl0itXXDQ7YPZ3Yt7w8vBDWPi8VsyFwaM9Uvk0Osx VhNArx4TnU3fjYos+7pom6xNQNab2FV1SZKmss5SKAx5+Ah9xFzkP23qRt4s0AXVRBXy UPA9YOQtAFEr2d98r8pOMfTjtjxPH/ZhEdS/4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.21.158 with SMTP id j30mr3284168ibb.4.1254430743028; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:59:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <71e1b5740910011145n43b441b4p8c20fbccd9e2e3e1@mail.gmail.com> References: <5a75db780910011122q34b64b30w826fbb103672737d@mail.gmail.com> <71e1b5740910011145n43b441b4p8c20fbccd9e2e3e1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:59:02 -0700 Message-ID: <5a75db780910011359t5e6a9450wb05002b51f72ff38@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [2.x] New depdendencies causing failure on distribution build From: Luciano Resende To: dev@tuscany.apache.org, antelder@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:45 AM, ant elder wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Luciano Resende wr= ote: >> Looks like the recent module additions are causing distribution build >> failure. Some dependencies are newer then then ones we have in the >> LICENSE, others are older and we might have to exclude, and some are >> just not there. >> Ant, could you please take a look at them ? >> > > I'm about to go out so wont be able to do it till tomorrow now. Should > be pretty straight forwad to fix if anyone can get to it before then. > > =A0 ...ant > Fixed under svn r820777 --=20 Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/