tuscany-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [2.x] reviewing/summarizing domain operation - was: Re: Discovery-based SCA Domain for OSGi RFC 119
Date Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:43:30 GMT
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:49 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Simon Laws <simonslaws@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> b3/ one or more composite files but which are present in
>> META-INF/sca-deployables (is this still supported?)
> No, i think i took out support for that earlier on in 2.x when porting
> from 1.x, there may be a ML thread. Something like that still seems
> like a good idea to me though to make it seem easy to create a simple
> contribution. I'd quite like the spec people to extend the application
> composite concept in the JEE spec to the Assembly spec so you can have
> something like application composite with a standard name in a regular
> contribution like you can have a web.composite in a .war contribution.
> I guess we could add support for that to Tuscany and see what the spec
> people think of it?

Any comments on that? Would anyone mind if the standalone runtime
supported using a single composite named "application.composite" in a
contribution as well as the meta-inf/sca-contribution.xml approach?


View raw message