tuscany-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ant elder <antel...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
Date Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:43:13 GMT
Sure and like i said i don't think there's any policy about it so
there's no urgent need to change anything yet, its just an fyi.

   ...ant

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Raymond Feng <enjoyjava@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is a workaround to use svn as the maven repo to host some dependencies
> that are not in the central maven repo. I would like to keep it before we
> can push all the dependencies into the central maven repo. As Luciano
> pointed out, getting third party jars into maven central repo is really
> painful and we cannot afford the "wait" in such cases.
>
> I thought svn is more reliable than the people.apache.org. The Axis2 folks
> have ws zone. Can we get one :-)?
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "ant elder" <antelder@apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:11 PM
> To: <dev@tuscany.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
>
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> We also should look at not requiring the maven repo folder we have in
>>>> SVN as these are being actively discouraged now.
>>>>
>>>
>>> How would we go about publishing dependencies that are not available
>>> in a public maven repo ? Should we use p.a.o instead of svn ? I
>>> believe Raymond and I have tried the maven central in the past without
>>> much luck.
>>>
>>
>> AIUI the feeling within the ASF and Maven project is that repositories
>> in the ASF SVN are a "terrible idea". No offical policy yet that I've
>> seen but other projects that had them are getting rid of them, eg
>> Geronimo - http://apache.markmail.org/message/l2xztcnnpgioxqww
>>
>>  ...ant
>
>

Mime
View raw message