tuscany-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Raymond Feng" <enjoyj...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
Date Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:20:06 GMT
It is a workaround to use svn as the maven repo to host some dependencies 
that are not in the central maven repo. I would like to keep it before we 
can push all the dependencies into the central maven repo. As Luciano 
pointed out, getting third party jars into maven central repo is really 
painful and we cannot afford the "wait" in such cases.

I thought svn is more reliable than the people.apache.org. The Axis2 folks 
have ws zone. Can we get one :-)?

Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "ant elder" <antelder@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:11 PM
To: <dev@tuscany.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure

> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> We also should look at not requiring the maven repo folder we have in
>>> SVN as these are being actively discouraged now.
>>>
>>
>> How would we go about publishing dependencies that are not available
>> in a public maven repo ? Should we use p.a.o instead of svn ? I
>> believe Raymond and I have tried the maven central in the past without
>> much luck.
>>
>
> AIUI the feeling within the ASF and Maven project is that repositories
> in the ASF SVN are a "terrible idea". No offical policy yet that I've
> seen but other projects that had them are getting rid of them, eg
> Geronimo - http://apache.markmail.org/message/l2xztcnnpgioxqww
>
>   ...ant 


Mime
View raw message