tuscany-dev mailing list archives: March 2009

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Backward compatibility
ant elder   Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Backward compatibility Sun, 01 Mar, 10:39
Mark Combellack     RE: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Backward compatibility Mon, 02 Mar, 13:32
Simon Laws       Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Backward compatibility Thu, 05 Mar, 14:30
Yang Lei         Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Backward compatibility Tue, 10 Mar, 21:09
Simon Laws           Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Backward compatibility Thu, 12 Mar, 11:44
Raymond Feng   Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Backward compatibility Thu, 05 Mar, 19:20
Simon Laws     Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Backward compatibility Tue, 10 Mar, 10:40
Luciano Resende       Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Backward compatibility Tue, 10 Mar, 15:28
Raymond Feng         Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Backward compatibility Tue, 10 Mar, 15:44
Simon Laws           Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Backward compatibility Tue, 10 Mar, 15:54
Simon Laws             Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Backward compatibility Thu, 12 Mar, 11:25
Re: Android progress update
Oscar Castaneda   Re: Android progress update Sun, 01 Mar, 16:13
Adriano Crestani     Re: Android progress update Wed, 04 Mar, 21:09
Luciano Resende       Re: Android progress update Wed, 04 Mar, 21:41
Re: Android good and bad news
Oscar Castaneda   Re: Android good and bad news Sun, 01 Mar, 16:19
Luciano Resende [2.x] Failing unit tests due to classPath issues in Eclipse PDE platform Mon, 02 Mar, 06:45
ant elder   Re: [2.x] Failing unit tests due to classPath issues in Eclipse PDE platform Mon, 02 Mar, 07:47
Simon Laws     Re: [2.x] Failing unit tests due to classPath issues in Eclipse PDE platform Mon, 02 Mar, 10:47
ant elder       Re: [2.x] Failing unit tests due to classPath issues in Eclipse PDE platform Mon, 02 Mar, 11:41
Raymond Feng     Re: [2.x] Failing unit tests due to classPath issues in Eclipse PDE platform Mon, 02 Mar, 17:27
Re: Tuscany maven archetypes
ant elder   Re: Tuscany maven archetypes Mon, 02 Mar, 10:54
Simon Laws     Re: Tuscany maven archetypes Mon, 02 Mar, 11:07
ant elder   Re: Tuscany maven archetypes Mon, 02 Mar, 20:21
ant elder 2.0 M2 release? Mon, 02 Mar, 11:18
ant elder   Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 05 Mar, 09:19
Luciano Resende     Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 05 Mar, 16:55
ant elder       Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 05 Mar, 17:07
ant elder     Re: 2.0 M2 release? Wed, 18 Mar, 09:29
Ramkumar R       Re: 2.0 M2 release? Wed, 18 Mar, 10:14
Simon Laws         Re: 2.0 M2 release? Wed, 18 Mar, 10:26
ant elder           Re: 2.0 M2 release? Wed, 18 Mar, 10:48
ant elder           Re: 2.0 M2 release? Sat, 21 Mar, 09:05
Simon Laws             Re: 2.0 M2 release? Sat, 21 Mar, 09:15
ant elder               Re: 2.0 M2 release? Mon, 23 Mar, 09:40
Raymond Feng                 Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Wed, 25 Mar, 16:09
ant elder                   Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Wed, 25 Mar, 16:17
Raymond Feng                     Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 26 Mar, 00:31
ant elder                       Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 26 Mar, 07:44
ant elder                         Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 26 Mar, 11:15
Raymond Feng                           Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 26 Mar, 16:08
ant elder                             Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 26 Mar, 16:44
Raymond Feng                               Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 26 Mar, 17:06
ant elder                                 Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 26 Mar, 17:09
Raymond Feng                                   Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 26 Mar, 18:35
ant elder                                     Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 26 Mar, 19:03
Raymond Feng                                       Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 26 Mar, 20:02
ant elder                                         Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 26 Mar, 20:08
Raymond Feng                                           Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 26 Mar, 21:57
ant elder                                             Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Fri, 27 Mar, 07:58
ant elder                                               Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Fri, 27 Mar, 15:30
Raymond Feng                                                 Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Fri, 27 Mar, 16:14
ant elder                                                   Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Fri, 27 Mar, 16:16
ant elder                                                     Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Fri, 27 Mar, 17:06
ant elder                                                     Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Sun, 29 Mar, 22:30
ant elder                             Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release? Thu, 26 Mar, 16:46
[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project -
Contin...@vmbuild.apache.org   [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project - Mon, 02 Mar, 11:20
Contin...@vmbuild.apache.org   [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project - Mon, 02 Mar, 11:33
Contin...@vmbuild.apache.org   [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project - Wed, 04 Mar, 11:24
Contin...@vmbuild.apache.org   [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project - Wed, 04 Mar, 11:37
Contin...@vmbuild.apache.org   [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project - Fri, 06 Mar, 12:39
Contin...@vmbuild.apache.org   [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project - Sun, 15 Mar, 10:05
[continuum] BUILD ERROR: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project -
Contin...@vmbuild.apache.org   [continuum] BUILD ERROR: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project - Mon, 02 Mar, 11:25
Contin...@vmbuild.apache.org   [continuum] BUILD ERROR: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project - Wed, 04 Mar, 11:29
Re: Doubts related to the binding.ws
Douglas Leite   Re: Doubts related to the binding.ws Mon, 02 Mar, 17:35
Ramkumar R     Re: Doubts related to the binding.ws Mon, 02 Mar, 18:16
Douglas Leite       Re: Doubts related to the binding.ws Tue, 03 Mar, 13:49
Lakshman Mukkamalla   Re: Doubts related to the binding.ws Thu, 19 Mar, 06:46
Dave Sowerby Binding a single service with both SOAP/HTTP and SOAP/JMS Mon, 02 Mar, 17:41
Simon Laws   Re: Binding a single service with both SOAP/HTTP and SOAP/JMS Mon, 02 Mar, 18:26
Dave Sowerby     Re: Binding a single service with both SOAP/HTTP and SOAP/JMS Tue, 03 Mar, 07:16
Dave Sowerby       Re: Binding a single service with both SOAP/HTTP and SOAP/JMS Tue, 03 Mar, 14:34
Simon Laws         Re: Binding a single service with both SOAP/HTTP and SOAP/JMS Wed, 04 Mar, 10:16
Simon Laws           Re: Binding a single service with both SOAP/HTTP and SOAP/JMS Wed, 04 Mar, 10:30
Simon Laws             Re: Binding a single service with both SOAP/HTTP and SOAP/JMS Wed, 04 Mar, 10:36
ant elder           Re: Binding a single service with both SOAP/HTTP and SOAP/JMS Wed, 04 Mar, 10:58
Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA) [jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2875) Unannotated spring context's are not interpreted correctly w.r.t references vs properties. Mon, 02 Mar, 18:28
Re: [1.x] implementation.spring component type generation
Ramkumar R   Re: [1.x] implementation.spring component type generation Mon, 02 Mar, 18:32
Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA) [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2875) Unannotated spring context's are not interpreted correctly w.r.t references vs properties. Tue, 03 Mar, 06:58
Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA) [jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2875) Unannotated spring context's are not interpreted correctly w.r.t references vs properties. Tue, 03 Mar, 07:00
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2872) Maven Bundle Plugin throws NPE when a dependent non-OSGI jar has no manifest Tue, 03 Mar, 07:38
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2873) Wrapping of non-OSGi components creates versions that may makes no-sense Tue, 03 Mar, 07:42
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2873) Wrapping of non-OSGi components creates versions that may makes no-sense
ant elder (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2873) Wrapping of non-OSGi components creates versions that may makes no-sense Tue, 03 Mar, 07:50
ant elder (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2873) Wrapping of non-OSGi components creates versions that may makes no-sense Tue, 03 Mar, 07:58
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2872) Maven Bundle Plugin throws NPE when a dependent non-OSGI jar has no manifest Tue, 03 Mar, 07:50
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2877) Introducing a generic Eclipse-BuddyPolicy header for the bundles generated from dependent artifacts would be helpful Tue, 03 Mar, 07:52
ant elder (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-2876) In artifact aggrations, artifactMemebers is misspelled and may lead to error prone configurations Tue, 03 Mar, 07:56
ant elder JSP taglib DOCTYPE problem Tue, 03 Mar, 08:22
Raymond Feng   Re: JSP taglib DOCTYPE problem Tue, 03 Mar, 16:39
ant elder     Re: JSP taglib DOCTYPE problem Tue, 03 Mar, 17:07
ant elder 1.0.1 release of the bundle plugin Tue, 03 Mar, 08:29
Raymond Feng   Re: 1.0.1 release of the bundle plugin Tue, 03 Mar, 16:43
Simon Laws     Re: 1.0.1 release of the bundle plugin Wed, 04 Mar, 09:46
kujunguo kujunguo About the property value Tue, 03 Mar, 09:29
Ku Jun Guo (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2898) SCA 1.x failed to get the property value for the complex type Tue, 03 Mar, 09:44
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2898) SCA 1.x failed to get the property value for the complex type
Ku Jun Guo (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2898) SCA 1.x failed to get the property value for the complex type Tue, 03 Mar, 09:46
Dan Becker (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2898) SCA 1.x failed to get the property value for the complex type Wed, 04 Mar, 19:55
Ku Jun Guo (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2898) SCA 1.x failed to get the property value for the complex type Thu, 05 Mar, 08:53
Dan Becker (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2898) SCA 1.x failed to get the property value for the complex type Fri, 13 Mar, 18:25
Ku Jun Guo (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2899) SCA 1.x failed to get the property value for the complex type when using @element Tue, 03 Mar, 10:08
Dave Sowerby (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2900) WSDL Generation does not respect all binding.ws entries Tue, 03 Mar, 14:32
Re: SCA Java EE: WAR contribution processing
Vamsavardhana Reddy   Re: SCA Java EE: WAR contribution processing Tue, 03 Mar, 17:12
Simon Laws     Re: SCA Java EE: WAR contribution processing Tue, 24 Mar, 09:41
ant elder   Re: SCA Java EE: WAR contribution processing Tue, 24 Mar, 16:44
Vamsavardhana Reddy     Re: SCA Java EE: WAR contribution processing Tue, 24 Mar, 17:44
Vamsavardhana Reddy     Re: SCA Java EE: WAR contribution processing Tue, 24 Mar, 17:52
ant elder       Re: SCA Java EE: WAR contribution processing Wed, 25 Mar, 09:20
Ku Jun Guo (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2901) It should throw a runtime exception when component property name is not matched Wed, 04 Mar, 02:04
Ku Jun Guo (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2902) @many="false" of the property failed to restrict the multi values Wed, 04 Mar, 04:03
Ku Jun Guo (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2903) There is no @replace attribute for <wire> Wed, 04 Mar, 05:54
Simon Laws (JIRA) [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2904) <binding.ws> jms error when jms transport is not configured Wed, 04 Mar, 10:45
Simon Laws (JIRA) [jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2904) <binding.ws> jms error when jms transport is not configured Wed, 04 Mar, 12:17
Dan Becker (JIRA) [jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2897) requestConnection and responseConnection in JMSBinding model should be QNames not Strings Wed, 04 Mar, 13:45
Re: Re: Tuscany-based MID data state monitoring service
lixiang03   Re: Re: Tuscany-based MID data state monitoring service Wed, 04 Mar, 15:20
lixiang03   Re: Re: Tuscany-based MID data state monitoring service Thu, 05 Mar, 14:45
Luciano Resende     Re: Re: Tuscany-based MID data state monitoring service Thu, 05 Mar, 19:24
Dan Becker (JIRA) [jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2897) requestConnection and responseConnection in JMSBinding model should be QNames not Strings Wed, 04 Mar, 15:47
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2884) [1.x] This jira is used to submit test case
Dan Becker (JIRA)   [jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2884) [1.x] This jira is used to submit test case Wed, 04 Mar, 20:35
Simon Laws (JIRA)   [jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2884) [1.x] This jira is used to submit test case Thu, 12 Mar, 08:58
Dan Becker (JIRA) [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2884) [1.x] This jira is used to submit test case Wed, 04 Mar, 20:47
Dan Becker (JIRA) [jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2871) ClassCastException using atom-abdera binding Wed, 04 Mar, 21:21
Luciano Resende [2.x] Progress update on bringing up Tuscany SCA Runtime to the latest OASIS SCA Schemas Wed, 04 Mar, 23:59
Raymond Feng   Re: [2.x] Progress update on bringing up Tuscany SCA Runtime to the latest OASIS SCA Schemas Thu, 05 Mar, 06:06
Simon Laws     Re: [2.x] Progress update on bringing up Tuscany SCA Runtime to the latest OASIS SCA Schemas Thu, 05 Mar, 15:26
Raymond Feng       Re: [2.x] Progress update on bringing up Tuscany SCA Runtime to the latest OASIS SCA Schemas Thu, 05 Mar, 16:38
Simon Laws         Re: [2.x] Progress update on bringing up Tuscany SCA Runtime to the latest OASIS SCA Schemas Thu, 05 Mar, 16:45
Raymond Feng           Re: [2.x] Progress update on bringing up Tuscany SCA Runtime to the latest OASIS SCA Schemas Thu, 05 Mar, 18:23
Luciano Resende             Re: [2.x] Progress update on bringing up Tuscany SCA Runtime to the latest OASIS SCA Schemas Thu, 05 Mar, 22:36
Luciano Resende               Re: [2.x] Progress update on bringing up Tuscany SCA Runtime to the latest OASIS SCA Schemas Fri, 06 Mar, 04:43
Luciano Resende                 Re: [2.x] Progress update on bringing up Tuscany SCA Runtime to the latest OASIS SCA Schemas Mon, 09 Mar, 17:48
Ramkumar R                   Re: [2.x] Progress update on bringing up Tuscany SCA Runtime to the latest OASIS SCA Schemas Thu, 12 Mar, 06:08
Luciano Resende                     Re: [2.x] Progress update on bringing up Tuscany SCA Runtime to the latest OASIS SCA Schemas Thu, 12 Mar, 06:48
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Nov 20141
Aug 20143
Jul 20141
Jun 20142
May 20141
Apr 20143
Mar 20141
Nov 20137
Oct 201318
Sep 20138
Aug 201311
Jul 201315
Jun 20138
May 20138
Apr 20138
Feb 20136
Jan 20135
Dec 20128
Nov 201225
Oct 20127
Sep 201222
Aug 20122
Jul 201212
Jun 201243
May 201259
Apr 201245
Mar 2012108
Feb 201290
Jan 201253
Dec 201178
Nov 201155
Oct 2011119
Sep 2011143
Aug 2011417
Jul 2011236
Jun 2011224
May 2011196
Apr 2011193
Mar 2011213
Feb 2011372
Jan 2011206
Dec 2010143
Nov 2010283
Oct 2010503
Sep 2010600
Aug 2010277
Jul 2010314
Jun 2010382
May 2010397
Apr 2010245
Mar 2010452
Feb 2010269
Jan 2010483
Dec 2009147
Nov 2009487
Oct 2009729
Sep 2009430
Aug 2009505
Jul 2009548
Jun 2009603
May 2009659
Apr 2009627
Mar 2009604
Feb 2009816
Jan 2009611
Dec 2008531
Nov 2008586
Oct 2008447
Sep 2008624
Aug 2008905
Jul 2008898
Jun 20081126
May 20081032
Apr 20081273
Mar 20081445
Feb 2008990
Jan 2008988
Dec 2007526
Nov 2007814
Oct 2007949
Sep 20071733
Aug 20071694
Jul 20071560
Jun 20071029
May 20071184
Apr 20071040
Mar 20071369
Feb 20071320
Jan 20071292
Dec 2006892
Nov 20061213
Oct 20061570
Sep 20061284
Aug 20061676
Jul 20061234
Jun 2006840
May 20061483
Apr 2006756
Mar 2006709
Feb 2006292
Jan 2006342
Dec 200554