|
Re: Tuscany integration with Geronimo: What's common to SCA and what's sepcific to Geronimo?, was: Re: GSoC Project - Tuscany SCA support in the Geronimo admin Console |
|
| haleh mahbod |
Re: Tuscany integration with Geronimo: What's common to SCA and what's sepcific to Geronimo?, was: Re: GSoC Project - Tuscany SCA support in the Geronimo admin Console |
Tue, 01 Jul, 01:02 |
| ant elder |
Re: Tuscany integration with Geronimo: What's common to SCA and what's sepcific to Geronimo?, was: Re: GSoC Project - Tuscany SCA support in the Geronimo admin Console |
Thu, 03 Jul, 10:43 |
| ant elder |
Re: Tuscany integration with Geronimo: What's common to SCA and what's sepcific to Geronimo?, was: Re: GSoC Project - Tuscany SCA support in the Geronimo admin Console |
Wed, 09 Jul, 07:56 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy |
Re: Tuscany integration with Geronimo: What's common to SCA and what's sepcific to Geronimo?, was: Re: GSoC Project - Tuscany SCA support in the Geronimo admin Console |
Wed, 09 Jul, 08:01 |
| Dan Becker |
Re: Tuscany integration with Geronimo: What's common to SCA and what's sepcific to Geronimo?, was: Re: GSoC Project - Tuscany SCA support in the Geronimo admin Console |
Wed, 09 Jul, 15:19 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: Tuscany integration with Geronimo: What's common to SCA and what's sepcific to Geronimo?, was: Re: GSoC Project - Tuscany SCA support in the Geronimo admin Console |
Wed, 09 Jul, 15:21 |
| ant elder |
Re: Tuscany integration with Geronimo: What's common to SCA and what's sepcific to Geronimo?, was: Re: GSoC Project - Tuscany SCA support in the Geronimo admin Console |
Wed, 09 Jul, 16:07 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy |
Re: Tuscany integration with Geronimo: What's common to SCA and what's sepcific to Geronimo?, was: Re: GSoC Project - Tuscany SCA support in the Geronimo admin Console |
Fri, 18 Jul, 14:55 |
| ant elder |
Re: Tuscany integration with Geronimo: What's common to SCA and what's sepcific to Geronimo?, was: Re: GSoC Project - Tuscany SCA support in the Geronimo admin Console |
Mon, 28 Jul, 11:15 |
| Thilina Buddhika |
Re: GSoC Project - Tuscany SCA support in the Geronimo admin Console |
Sun, 06 Jul, 19:04 |
| Thilina Buddhika |
Re: GSoC Project - Tuscany SCA support in the Geronimo admin Console |
Wed, 30 Jul, 06:06 |
|
Re: Changing java/pom/parent/pom.xml |
|
| ant elder |
Re: Changing java/pom/parent/pom.xml |
Tue, 01 Jul, 06:48 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: Changing java/pom/parent/pom.xml |
Tue, 01 Jul, 08:47 |
| ant elder |
Re: Changing java/pom/parent/pom.xml |
Tue, 01 Jul, 08:55 |
| ant elder |
Re: Changing java/pom/parent/pom.xml |
Thu, 03 Jul, 07:39 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: Changing java/pom/parent/pom.xml |
Thu, 03 Jul, 21:26 |
|
Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
|
| ant elder |
Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Tue, 01 Jul, 07:26 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Tue, 01 Jul, 10:59 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Tue, 01 Jul, 16:53 |
| ant elder |
Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Wed, 02 Jul, 07:44 |
| ant elder |
Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Tue, 01 Jul, 07:40 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Tue, 01 Jul, 11:09 |
| ant elder |
Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Tue, 01 Jul, 15:04 |
| Raymond Feng |
Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Tue, 01 Jul, 17:11 |
| ant elder |
Re: Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Tue, 01 Jul, 23:51 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Wed, 02 Jul, 02:04 |
| ant elder |
Re: Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Wed, 02 Jul, 06:58 |
| ant elder |
Re: Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Wed, 02 Jul, 16:05 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Wed, 02 Jul, 16:34 |
| ant elder |
Re: Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Wed, 02 Jul, 16:38 |
| ant elder |
Re: Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Wed, 02 Jul, 16:42 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Mon, 07 Jul, 10:59 |
| ant elder |
Re: Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Mon, 07 Jul, 11:10 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Mon, 07 Jul, 17:58 |
| ant elder |
Re: Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Tue, 08 Jul, 08:45 |
| haleh mahbod |
Re: Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Thu, 10 Jul, 01:47 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Thu, 10 Jul, 07:57 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Thu, 10 Jul, 16:43 |
| ant elder |
Re: Grouping/Aggregating tuscany modules, was: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Sun, 13 Jul, 10:06 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes |
Tue, 01 Jul, 11:22 |
| Simon Laws |
R1.3 RC0 |
Tue, 01 Jul, 08:32 |
|
Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2445) [Proposal] Support of conversational web service |
|
| Simon Laws |
Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2445) [Proposal] Support of conversational web service |
Tue, 01 Jul, 09:03 |
| Sun Yang |
Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2445) [Proposal] Support of conversational web service |
Tue, 01 Jul, 14:03 |
| ant elder (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2445) [Proposal] Support of conversational web service |
Tue, 01 Jul, 09:19 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2445) [Proposal] Support of conversational web service |
Tue, 01 Jul, 11:33 |
| Sun Yang |
Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2445) [Proposal] Support of conversational web service |
Tue, 01 Jul, 14:12 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2445) [Proposal] Support of conversational web service |
Tue, 01 Jul, 21:19 |
| Sun Yang |
Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2445) [Proposal] Support of conversational web service |
Tue, 01 Jul, 14:30 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2445) [Proposal] Support of conversational web service |
Tue, 01 Jul, 21:28 |
| Sun Yang |
Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2445) [Proposal] Support of conversational web service |
Fri, 04 Jul, 09:04 |
|
Re: [Fwd: get a reference to a domain from a remote program] |
|
| Simon Laws |
Re: [Fwd: get a reference to a domain from a remote program] |
Tue, 01 Jul, 10:15 |
| Hinde Bouziane |
Re: [Fwd: get a reference to a domain from a remote program] |
Wed, 02 Jul, 12:46 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: [Fwd: get a reference to a domain from a remote program] |
Wed, 02 Jul, 13:00 |
| Hinde Bouziane |
Re: [Fwd: get a reference to a domain from a remote program] |
Thu, 03 Jul, 09:46 |
| ant elder (JIRA) |
[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-2431) samples/helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp |
Tue, 01 Jul, 11:17 |
| ant elder (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2431) samples/helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp |
Tue, 01 Jul, 11:17 |
| Simon Nash |
[Fwd: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes] |
Tue, 01 Jul, 11:27 |
| ant elder |
Re: [Fwd: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes] |
Tue, 01 Jul, 23:23 |
| Simon Nash |
[Fwd: Re: GSoC Project - Tuscany SCA support in the Geronimo admin Console] |
Tue, 01 Jul, 11:51 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: svn commit: r672803 [3/3] - in /tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.3: itest/validation/src/main/java/calculator/warning/ itest/validation/src/main/resources/NoMatchingBinding/ itest/validation/src/main/resources/ServiceNotFoundForComponentService/ itest |
Tue, 01 Jul, 12:30 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: svn commit: r672803 [3/3] - in /tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.3: itest/validation/src/main/java/calculator/warning/ itest/validation/src/main/resources/NoMatchingBinding/ itest/validation/src/main/resources/ServiceNotFoundForComponentService/ itest |
Tue, 01 Jul, 17:09 |
|
Re: Issue faced in creating a subset of Tuscany runtime using domain-management sample |
|
| Greg Dritschler |
Re: Issue faced in creating a subset of Tuscany runtime using domain-management sample |
Tue, 01 Jul, 14:38 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Issue faced in creating a subset of Tuscany runtime using domain-management sample |
Tue, 01 Jul, 15:28 |
|
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2442) Remove any remaining references to incubator |
|
| ant elder (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2442) Remove any remaining references to incubator |
Tue, 01 Jul, 14:50 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2442) Remove any remaining references to incubator |
Tue, 01 Jul, 15:02 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2442) Remove any remaining references to incubator |
Tue, 01 Jul, 15:20 |
| Luciano Resende (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2442) Remove any remaining references to incubator |
Tue, 01 Jul, 18:54 |
| ant elder (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2442) Remove any remaining references to incubator |
Thu, 10 Jul, 13:56 |
| Honghsi Lo |
How the Intent work |
Tue, 01 Jul, 15:57 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: How the Intent work |
Tue, 01 Jul, 17:24 |
|
The integration test for binding.corba is working now! |
|
| Raymond Feng |
The integration test for binding.corba is working now! |
Tue, 01 Jul, 16:11 |
| Wojtek Janiszewski |
Re: The integration test for binding.corba is working now! |
Fri, 04 Jul, 00:55 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: The integration test for binding.corba is working now! |
Mon, 07 Jul, 17:20 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: The integration test for binding.corba is working now! |
Tue, 08 Jul, 17:14 |
| Raymond Feng |
Corbaname patch, was: Re: The integration test for binding.corba is working now! |
Mon, 07 Jul, 23:58 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2446) WSDL generation should be in the builder, not the provider |
Tue, 01 Jul, 17:05 |
|
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2422) samples/osgi-supplychain |
|
| Rajini Sivaram (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2422) samples/osgi-supplychain |
Tue, 01 Jul, 19:50 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2422) samples/osgi-supplychain |
Wed, 02 Jul, 07:48 |
| Adriano Crestani |
support for more than one return value on implementation.xquery |
Tue, 01 Jul, 21:32 |
| Simon Nash (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2447) Remove obsolete interface-wsdl-java2wsdl module |
Tue, 01 Jul, 21:32 |
| Simon Nash (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2447) Remove obsolete interface-wsdl-java2wsdl module |
Tue, 01 Jul, 21:38 |
|
Fwd: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project - Build Def: |
|
| Luciano Resende |
Fwd: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project - Build Def: |
Tue, 01 Jul, 22:12 |
| Wojtek Janiszewski |
Re: Fwd: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project - Build Def: |
Wed, 02 Jul, 00:22 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: Fwd: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project - Build Def: |
Wed, 02 Jul, 02:06 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: Fwd: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project - Build Def: |
Wed, 02 Jul, 02:27 |
| Kevin Williams |
Warning on duplicate component names |
Tue, 01 Jul, 22:40 |
| Mike Edwards |
Re: Warning on duplicate component names |
Thu, 03 Jul, 15:12 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: Warning on duplicate component names |
Thu, 03 Jul, 15:29 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: Warning on duplicate component names |
Thu, 03 Jul, 15:49 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Warning on duplicate component names |
Thu, 03 Jul, 15:54 |
| Kevin Williams |
Re: Warning on duplicate component names |
Thu, 03 Jul, 16:10 |
| Mike Edwards |
Re: Warning on duplicate component names |
Thu, 03 Jul, 21:59 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2448) Support cross-domain invocations in Web 2.0 bindings |
Tue, 01 Jul, 23:38 |
|
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2357) CORBA service/reference binding |
|
| Wojtek Janiszewski (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2357) CORBA service/reference binding |
Tue, 01 Jul, 23:50 |
| Wojtek Janiszewski (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2357) CORBA service/reference binding |
Thu, 03 Jul, 20:45 |
| Wojtek Janiszewski (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2357) CORBA service/reference binding |
Wed, 09 Jul, 21:25 |
| Wojtek Janiszewski (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2357) CORBA service/reference binding |
Tue, 15 Jul, 17:35 |
| Simon Nash (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2449) Binding builders for component and composite services should be separated |
Wed, 02 Jul, 06:54 |
| Simon Nash (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2449) Binding builders for component and composite services should be separated |
Wed, 02 Jul, 08:02 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: svn commit: r673298 - in /tuscany/java/sca: modules/contribution-java/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/contribution/java/impl/ modules/databinding-jaxb/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/databinding/jaxb/ modules/databinding/src/main/java/o |
Wed, 02 Jul, 09:23 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: svn commit: r673298 - in /tuscany/java/sca: modules/contribution-java/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/contribution/java/impl/ modules/databinding-jaxb/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/databinding/jaxb/ modules/databinding/src/main/java/o |
Wed, 02 Jul, 15:00 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2437) samples/helloworld-reference&service-jms READMEs incorrect |
Wed, 02 Jul, 09:50 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2352) Recusive composition binding overiding not working corectly. |
Wed, 02 Jul, 10:22 |
| Lou Amodeo (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2444) JAXWSJavaInterfaceProcessor NPE getting pavkage name |
Wed, 02 Jul, 11:30 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2420) samples/helloworld-service-jms |
Wed, 02 Jul, 11:55 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2437) samples/helloworld-reference&service-jms READMEs incorrect |
Wed, 02 Jul, 11:55 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2420) samples/helloworld-service-jms |
Wed, 02 Jul, 11:57 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2410) samples/calculator-distributed fails |
Wed, 02 Jul, 12:21 |
|
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2410) samples/calculator-distributed fails |
|
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2410) samples/calculator-distributed fails |
Wed, 02 Jul, 12:23 |
| ant elder (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2410) samples/calculator-distributed fails |
Thu, 03 Jul, 15:51 |
| ant elder (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2410) samples/calculator-distributed fails |
Thu, 10 Jul, 08:09 |
|
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2417) Running myapp.CallbackClientTestCase fails in Continuum build due to java.net.BindException: Address already in use:8080 |
|
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2417) Running myapp.CallbackClientTestCase fails in Continuum build due to java.net.BindException: Address already in use:8080 |
Wed, 02 Jul, 12:49 |
| ant elder (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2417) Running myapp.CallbackClientTestCase fails in Continuum build due to java.net.BindException: Address already in use:8080 |
Thu, 03 Jul, 15:42 |
| Simon Nash (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2417) Running myapp.CallbackClientTestCase fails in Continuum build due to java.net.BindException: Address already in use:8080 |
Thu, 24 Jul, 20:41 |
|
Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2409) Major consumability issues with new Node and Domain APIs |
|
| Simon Laws |
Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2409) Major consumability issues with new Node and Domain APIs |
Wed, 02 Jul, 13:24 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2450) Fix RAT issues reported against release 1.3 |
Wed, 02 Jul, 13:55 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2428) samples/calculator-ws-webapp - failure on start |
Wed, 02 Jul, 14:31 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2450) Fix RAT issues reported against release 1.3 |
Wed, 02 Jul, 14:31 |