| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2271) Java runtime should not inject property into an unannotated non-public field |
Thu, 01 May, 03:14 |
|
Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany |
|
| Simon Laws |
Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany |
Thu, 01 May, 06:49 |
| Wojtek Janiszewski |
Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany |
Thu, 01 May, 12:06 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany |
Thu, 01 May, 12:34 |
| Wojtek Janiszewski |
Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany |
Sat, 03 May, 18:10 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany |
Thu, 08 May, 03:45 |
| Wojtek Janiszewski |
Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany |
Thu, 22 May, 10:21 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany |
Thu, 22 May, 22:35 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany |
Wed, 28 May, 20:51 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany |
Thu, 29 May, 09:17 |
| Wojtek Janiszewski |
Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany |
Fri, 30 May, 19:26 |
| Mike Edwards |
Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany |
Thu, 29 May, 11:02 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany |
Thu, 29 May, 15:37 |
|
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
|
| Rajini Sivaram |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Thu, 01 May, 08:20 |
| Rajini Sivaram |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Thu, 01 May, 09:03 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Thu, 01 May, 09:10 |
| Mike Edwards |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Thu, 01 May, 10:25 |
| Graham Charters |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Thu, 01 May, 12:00 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Thu, 01 May, 12:23 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Thu, 01 May, 18:07 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Thu, 01 May, 18:07 |
| Rajini Sivaram |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Fri, 02 May, 08:51 |
| Graham Charters |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Fri, 02 May, 10:05 |
| Rajini Sivaram |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Fri, 02 May, 14:23 |
| Rajini Sivaram |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Mon, 05 May, 16:41 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Mon, 05 May, 18:42 |
| Rajini Sivaram |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Tue, 06 May, 07:54 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Sat, 10 May, 17:22 |
| Rajini Sivaram |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Sun, 11 May, 21:14 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Mon, 12 May, 22:42 |
| Rajini Sivaram |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Tue, 13 May, 08:40 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Tue, 13 May, 16:52 |
| Rajini Sivaram |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Tue, 13 May, 22:14 |
| ant elder |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Fri, 02 May, 11:51 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Improving support for running in OSGi |
Mon, 05 May, 18:02 |
| Graham Charters (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2285) Make sca-api automatically build as an OSGi bundle |
Thu, 01 May, 08:28 |
| Rajini Sivaram (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2285) Make sca-api automatically build as an OSGi bundle |
Fri, 02 May, 07:52 |
| Graham Charters |
Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2285) Make sca-api automatically build as an OSGi bundle |
Fri, 02 May, 09:31 |
|
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2285) Make sca-api automatically build as an OSGi bundle |
|
| Graham Charters (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2285) Make sca-api automatically build as an OSGi bundle |
Thu, 01 May, 08:32 |
| Graham Charters (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2285) Make sca-api automatically build as an OSGi bundle |
Fri, 02 May, 12:50 |
|
Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2275) Problem when with Bean[] and null |
|
| Simon Nash |
Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2275) Problem when with Bean[] and null |
Thu, 01 May, 09:54 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2210) Java runtime should inject property to field with common name in absence of @Property |
Thu, 01 May, 10:58 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2210) Java runtime should inject property to field with common name in absence of @Property |
Thu, 01 May, 12:41 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2271) Java runtime should not inject property into an unannotated non-public field |
Thu, 01 May, 12:43 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2273) Return value of a method with @Init and @Destroy annotations must be a void |
Thu, 01 May, 13:05 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2271) Java runtime should not inject property into an unannotated non-public field |
Thu, 01 May, 13:48 |
| Simon Laws |
[DISCUSS] SCA API extensions based on OASIS bug fixes Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2281) How to create ServiceReferences for references using multiplicity="1..n" |
Thu, 01 May, 14:12 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: [DISCUSS] SCA API extensions based on OASIS bug fixes Re: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2281) How to create ServiceReferences for references using multiplicity="1..n" |
Thu, 01 May, 17:21 |
|
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2284) Update @Property vtest to test un-annotated non-public field |
|
| Gilbert Kwan (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2284) Update @Property vtest to test un-annotated non-public field |
Thu, 01 May, 14:20 |
| Gilbert Kwan (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2284) Update @Property vtest to test un-annotated non-public field |
Thu, 01 May, 14:20 |
| Gilbert Kwan (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2284) Update @Property vtest to test un-annotated non-public field |
Thu, 01 May, 20:10 |
| Gilbert Kwan (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2284) Update @Property vtest to test un-annotated non-public field |
Thu, 01 May, 20:10 |
| Kevin Williams (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2284) Update @Property vtest to test un-annotated non-public field |
Thu, 01 May, 14:22 |
| Gilbert Kwan (JIRA) |
[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (TUSCANY-2284) Update @Property vtest to test un-annotated non-public field |
Thu, 01 May, 14:22 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2271) Java runtime should not inject property into an unannotated non-public field |
Thu, 01 May, 14:48 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2273) Return value of a method with @Init and @Destroy annotations must be a void |
Thu, 01 May, 14:50 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2273) Return value of a method with @Init and @Destroy annotations must be a void |
Thu, 01 May, 15:32 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2272) @Init and @Destroy annotations on a non-public method |
Thu, 01 May, 15:34 |
| Luciano Resende |
[DAS] Are re ready for a DAS 1.0 release ? |
Thu, 01 May, 16:22 |
| ant elder |
Re: [DAS] Are re ready for a DAS 1.0 release ? |
Fri, 02 May, 11:09 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2272) @Init and @Destroy annotations on a non-public method |
Thu, 01 May, 16:24 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2272) @Init and @Destroy annotations on a non-public method |
Thu, 01 May, 16:30 |
|
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
|
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
Thu, 01 May, 16:52 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
Mon, 05 May, 17:37 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
Thu, 01 May, 16:52 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2287) Add vtest for @Destroy annotation |
Thu, 01 May, 16:52 |
|
Re: [CONF] Apache Tuscany: Build your first Web Services with Tuscany (page edited) |
|
| Luciano Resende |
Re: [CONF] Apache Tuscany: Build your first Web Services with Tuscany (page edited) |
Thu, 01 May, 17:04 |
|
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2285) Make sca-api automatically build as an OSGi bundle |
|
| Raymond Feng (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2285) Make sca-api automatically build as an OSGi bundle |
Thu, 01 May, 17:12 |
| Raymond Feng (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2285) Make sca-api automatically build as an OSGi bundle |
Fri, 02 May, 16:02 |
|
GSoC Project - Allow Google Android applications to easily consume business services |
|
| Oscar Castaneda |
GSoC Project - Allow Google Android applications to easily consume business services |
Thu, 01 May, 17:20 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: GSoC Project - Allow Google Android applications to easily consume business services |
Thu, 01 May, 17:34 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: GSoC Project - Allow Google Android applications to easily consume business services |
Thu, 01 May, 17:43 |
| Oscar Castaneda |
Re: GSoC Project - Allow Google Android applications to easily consume business services |
Thu, 01 May, 18:06 |
| Adriano Crestani |
Re: GSoC Project - Allow Google Android applications to easily consume business services |
Sat, 03 May, 05:24 |
| Oscar Castaneda |
GSoC Project - Allow Google Android applications to easily consume business services |
Fri, 02 May, 23:31 |
| Adriano Crestani |
Re: GSoC Project - Allow Google Android applications to easily consume business services |
Sat, 03 May, 06:18 |
| Oscar Castaneda |
Re: GSoC Project - Allow Google Android applications to easily consume business services |
Sun, 25 May, 21:35 |
| Florian Pinel (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2288) MappingWrapper.getInsertOrder() uses incorrect algorithm |
Thu, 01 May, 17:52 |
|
Re: What's next for SCA & BPEL Integration |
|
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: What's next for SCA & BPEL Integration |
Thu, 01 May, 18:22 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: What's next for SCA & BPEL Integration |
Thu, 01 May, 18:25 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: What's next for SCA & BPEL Integration |
Tue, 06 May, 19:08 |
| Mike Edwards |
Re: What's next for SCA & BPEL Integration |
Wed, 07 May, 20:16 |
| Mike Edwards |
Re: What's next for SCA & BPEL Integration - component type update done |
Wed, 07 May, 21:19 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: What's next for SCA & BPEL Integration - component type update done |
Wed, 07 May, 21:47 |
| Mike Edwards |
Re: What's next for SCA & BPEL Integration - component type update done |
Thu, 08 May, 03:13 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: What's next for SCA & BPEL Integration - component type update done |
Sat, 10 May, 17:28 |
| Gilbert Kwan (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2289) Java runtime should inject property into an unannotated non-public field by public setter |
Thu, 01 May, 19:22 |
|
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2289) Java runtime should inject property into an unannotated non-public field by public setter |
|
| Gilbert Kwan (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2289) Java runtime should inject property into an unannotated non-public field by public setter |
Thu, 01 May, 19:24 |
| Gilbert Kwan (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2289) Java runtime should inject property into an unannotated non-public field by public setter |
Thu, 01 May, 19:38 |
|
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2289) Java runtime should inject property into an unannotated non-public field by public setter |
|
| Gilbert Kwan (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2289) Java runtime should inject property into an unannotated non-public field by public setter |
Thu, 01 May, 19:24 |
| Gilbert Kwan (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2289) Java runtime should inject property into an unannotated non-public field by public setter |
Thu, 01 May, 19:44 |
|
Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bindings model object |
|
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bindings model object |
Thu, 01 May, 19:27 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bindings model object |
Thu, 01 May, 19:53 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bindings model object |
Fri, 02 May, 15:05 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bindings model object |
Sat, 03 May, 22:10 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bindings model object |
Fri, 09 May, 08:42 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bindings model object |
Sun, 11 May, 18:17 |
| Gilbert Kwan (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2289) Java runtime should not inject property into an unannotated non-public field by protected setter |
Thu, 01 May, 19:44 |
|
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
|
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
Thu, 01 May, 20:00 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
Thu, 01 May, 20:02 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
Thu, 01 May, 21:28 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
Fri, 02 May, 15:16 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
Mon, 05 May, 17:33 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
Mon, 05 May, 20:43 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
Mon, 05 May, 20:43 |
|
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2289) Java runtime should not inject property into an unannotated non-public field by protected setter |
|
| Gilbert Kwan (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2289) Java runtime should not inject property into an unannotated non-public field by protected setter |
Thu, 01 May, 20:14 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2289) Java runtime should not inject property into an unannotated non-public field by protected setter |
Thu, 01 May, 21:10 |
| Kevin Williams (JIRA) |
[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-2284) Update @Property vtest to test un-annotated non-public field |
Thu, 01 May, 20:32 |
|
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
|
| Kevin Williams (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
Thu, 01 May, 20:48 |
| Kevin Williams (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
Mon, 05 May, 20:39 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2286) Add vtest for @Init annotation |
Mon, 05 May, 20:49 |
|
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2287) Add vtest for @Destroy annotation |
|
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2287) Add vtest for @Destroy annotation |
Thu, 01 May, 20:52 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2287) Add vtest for @Destroy annotation |
Thu, 01 May, 20:54 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2287) Add vtest for @Destroy annotation |
Fri, 02 May, 15:20 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2287) Add vtest for @Destroy annotation |
Mon, 05 May, 17:37 |