|
Re: Moving on |
|
| Bert Lamb |
Re: Moving on |
Mon, 02 Apr, 01:39 |
| Paul Fremantle |
Re: Moving on |
Mon, 02 Apr, 10:20 |
| Valerio Schiavoni |
Re: Moving on |
Mon, 02 Apr, 11:42 |
| Matt Hogstrom |
Re: Moving on |
Mon, 02 Apr, 12:53 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Moving on |
Mon, 02 Apr, 16:33 |
| Meeraj Kunnumpurath |
Re: Moving on |
Mon, 02 Apr, 17:11 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: Moving on |
Mon, 02 Apr, 17:15 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: Moving on |
Tue, 03 Apr, 17:02 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: Moving on |
Tue, 03 Apr, 17:00 |
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
|
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Mon, 02 Apr, 04:10 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Mon, 02 Apr, 17:53 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Tue, 03 Apr, 08:18 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Thu, 19 Apr, 01:07 |
| ant elder |
Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Thu, 19 Apr, 09:52 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Thu, 19 Apr, 16:43 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Fri, 20 Apr, 13:46 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Lifecycle of runtime extensions, was: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Fri, 20 Apr, 15:44 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: Lifecycle of runtime extensions, was: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Sat, 21 Apr, 20:54 |
| ant elder |
Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Fri, 20 Apr, 16:00 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Fri, 20 Apr, 21:10 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Fri, 20 Apr, 16:59 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Fri, 20 Apr, 17:25 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Fri, 20 Apr, 17:42 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Fri, 20 Apr, 17:54 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Tue, 24 Apr, 11:32 |
| Raymond Feng |
Nominate Ant as the release manager was: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Tue, 24 Apr, 15:55 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: Nominate Ant as the release manager was: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Tue, 24 Apr, 16:13 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Nominate Ant as the release manager was: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Tue, 24 Apr, 19:28 |
| Venkata Krishnan |
Re: Nominate Ant as the release manager was: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Wed, 25 Apr, 05:25 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Using Tuscany in a webapp, was: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Fri, 20 Apr, 23:32 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: Using Tuscany in a webapp, was: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Sun, 22 Apr, 08:56 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: Using Tuscany in a webapp, was: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it |
Mon, 23 Apr, 16:38 |
| Simon Laws (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1184) Extend depth and breath of generated databinding tests |
Mon, 02 Apr, 07:48 |
|
Re: Merge improved databinding code into trunk |
|
| Simon Laws |
Re: Merge improved databinding code into trunk |
Mon, 02 Apr, 08:20 |
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1196) java.lang.ClassCastException org.eclipse.emf.ecore.impl.DynamicEObjectImpl incompatible with commonj.sdo.DataObject |
Mon, 02 Apr, 14:24 |
| muhwas |
calling tuscany service using spring |
Mon, 02 Apr, 16:11 |
| Raymond Feng |
Testcase failures in scdl4j |
Mon, 02 Apr, 16:38 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Testcase failures in scdl4j |
Tue, 03 Apr, 08:12 |
|
Re: Deep introspection in JavaInterfaceProcessorRegistryImpl |
|
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Deep introspection in JavaInterfaceProcessorRegistryImpl |
Mon, 02 Apr, 16:42 |
|
Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1 (IBMers involved with EMF code) |
|
| Paul Golick |
Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1 (IBMers involved with EMF code) |
Mon, 02 Apr, 17:23 |
| Frank Budinsky |
Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1 (IBMers involved with EMF code) |
Mon, 02 Apr, 19:09 |
|
Re: Using StAX-based loaders for SCDL? was: SCDL4J |
|
| Raymond Feng |
Re: Using StAX-based loaders for SCDL? was: SCDL4J |
Mon, 02 Apr, 17:40 |
| Venkata Krishnan |
Re: Using StAX-based loaders for SCDL? was: SCDL4J |
Tue, 03 Apr, 08:00 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Using StAX-based loaders for SCDL? was: SCDL4J |
Tue, 03 Apr, 08:59 |
| Sunny Ip (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1198) ClassCastException when getting back a type extended from anything besides a string |
Mon, 02 Apr, 19:12 |
| Sunny Ip (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1198) ClassCastException when getting back a type extended from anything besides a string |
Mon, 02 Apr, 19:14 |
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1198) ClassCastException when getting back a type extended from anything besides a string |
Mon, 02 Apr, 19:41 |
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1198) ClassCastException when getting back a type extended from anything besides a string |
Mon, 02 Apr, 19:52 |
| muhwas |
calling webservice using service interface only |
Mon, 02 Apr, 20:21 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: calling webservice using service interface only |
Tue, 03 Apr, 16:32 |
| muhwas |
Re: calling webservice using service interface only |
Tue, 03 Apr, 16:50 |
| Sunny Ip (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1199) ClassCastException when getting back a type extended from anything besides a string |
Mon, 02 Apr, 21:15 |
| Sunny Ip (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1199) ClassCastException when getting back a type extended from anything besides a string |
Mon, 02 Apr, 21:19 |
| Pamela Fong |
Question on ModelObject for binding extension |
Tue, 03 Apr, 01:31 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Question on ModelObject for binding extension |
Tue, 10 Apr, 20:46 |
| Pamela Fong |
Re: Question on ModelObject for binding extension |
Tue, 10 Apr, 22:48 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Question on ModelObject for binding extension |
Wed, 11 Apr, 00:07 |
| Snehit Prabhu |
Re: Question on ModelObject for binding extension |
Fri, 20 Apr, 10:29 |
| Simon Laws |
Re: Question on ModelObject for binding extension |
Fri, 20 Apr, 11:12 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Question on ModelObject for binding extension |
Fri, 20 Apr, 15:56 |
| Corville Allen |
Implementing support for Business Exceptions |
Tue, 03 Apr, 02:32 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: Implementing support for Business Exceptions |
Tue, 03 Apr, 16:40 |
| Scott Kurz |
Re: Implementing support for Business Exceptions |
Wed, 04 Apr, 17:00 |
| Corville Allen |
Re: Implementing support for Business Exceptions |
Fri, 06 Apr, 05:51 |
| Raymond Feng |
Bootstrap the tuscany system without dependency on SCDL and Java component |
Tue, 03 Apr, 04:33 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Bootstrap the tuscany system without dependency on SCDL and Java component |
Tue, 03 Apr, 16:00 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Bootstrap the tuscany system without dependency on SCDL and Java component |
Tue, 03 Apr, 16:13 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: Bootstrap the tuscany system without dependency on SCDL and Java component |
Tue, 03 Apr, 17:15 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: Bootstrap the tuscany system without dependency on SCDL and Java component |
Tue, 03 Apr, 17:25 |
| Luciano Resende |
Contribution services and SCDL4J |
Tue, 03 Apr, 07:47 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Contribution services and SCDL4J |
Wed, 04 Apr, 19:30 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: Contribution services and SCDL4J |
Wed, 04 Apr, 20:13 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Contribution services and SCDL4J |
Wed, 04 Apr, 21:57 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Contribution services and SCDL4J |
Thu, 05 Apr, 01:34 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: Contribution services and SCDL4J |
Fri, 06 Apr, 07:26 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Contribution services and SCDL4J |
Fri, 06 Apr, 18:25 |
| Venkata Krishnan |
Re: Contribution services and SCDL4J |
Sun, 08 Apr, 13:01 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Contribution services and SCDL4J |
Sun, 08 Apr, 16:59 |
| Venkata Krishnan |
Re: Contribution services and SCDL4J |
Sun, 08 Apr, 18:01 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: Contribution services and SCDL4J |
Sun, 08 Apr, 21:19 |
| Venkata Krishnan |
Re: Contribution services and SCDL4J |
Mon, 09 Apr, 05:30 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Contribution services and SCDL4J |
Mon, 09 Apr, 16:06 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Changes to SCA policy model |
Tue, 03 Apr, 07:55 |
|
[RESULT] Adriano Crestani for Tuscany Committer |
|
| Luciano Resende |
[RESULT] Adriano Crestani for Tuscany Committer |
Tue, 03 Apr, 08:04 |
| Adriano Crestani |
Re: [RESULT] Adriano Crestani for Tuscany Committer |
Tue, 03 Apr, 08:45 |
| Kevin Williams |
Re: [VOTE] Adriano Crestani for Tuscany Committer |
Thu, 05 Apr, 18:33 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
SCA source tree and build structure |
Tue, 03 Apr, 10:45 |
| Bert Lamb |
Re: SCA source tree and build structure |
Tue, 03 Apr, 14:57 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Do we need Ant builds for our samples? was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Tue, 03 Apr, 16:41 |
| Bert Lamb |
Re: Do we need Ant builds for our samples? was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Tue, 03 Apr, 18:02 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: Do we need Ant builds for our samples? was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Tue, 03 Apr, 19:17 |
| Simon Nash |
Re: Do we need Ant builds for our samples? was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Wed, 04 Apr, 14:09 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Do we need Ant builds for our samples? was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Wed, 04 Apr, 18:20 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: SCA source tree and build structure |
Tue, 03 Apr, 17:22 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: SCA source tree and build structure |
Tue, 03 Apr, 17:28 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: SCA source tree and build structure |
Tue, 03 Apr, 17:40 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: SCA source tree and build structure |
Tue, 03 Apr, 18:07 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: SCA source tree and build structure |
Tue, 03 Apr, 21:00 |
| Venkata Krishnan |
Re: SCA source tree and build structure |
Wed, 04 Apr, 05:14 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: SCA source tree and build structure |
Wed, 04 Apr, 18:33 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Build update, was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Thu, 05 Apr, 02:36 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: Build update, was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Thu, 05 Apr, 14:24 |
| Bert Lamb |
Re: Build update, was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Thu, 05 Apr, 15:14 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Build update, was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Thu, 05 Apr, 15:36 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: Build update, was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Thu, 05 Apr, 15:40 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: Build update, was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Thu, 05 Apr, 16:16 |
| Venkata Krishnan |
Re: Build update, was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Thu, 05 Apr, 17:15 |
| Raymond Feng |
Re: Build update, was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Thu, 05 Apr, 17:35 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Moving spec/sca-api module under sca? was: Build update |
Thu, 05 Apr, 20:55 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: Moving spec/sca-api module under sca? was: Build update |
Thu, 05 Apr, 21:00 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Moving spec/sca-api module under sca? was: Build update |
Thu, 05 Apr, 21:26 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: Moving spec/sca-api module under sca? was: Build update |
Fri, 06 Apr, 06:44 |
| Venkata Krishnan |
Re: SCA source tree and build structure |
Tue, 03 Apr, 17:59 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: SCA source tree and build structure |
Tue, 03 Apr, 18:14 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Cleaning up the tree under java/sca, was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Sat, 07 Apr, 19:34 |
| Ignacio Silva-Lepe |
Re: Cleaning up the tree under java/sca, was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Mon, 09 Apr, 19:59 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Cleaning up the tree under java/sca, was: SCA source tree and build structure |
Mon, 09 Apr, 20:55 |
| Venkata Krishnan |
Resumption of Weekly IRC ? |
Tue, 03 Apr, 12:50 |
| Bert Lamb |
Re: Resumption of Weekly IRC ? |
Tue, 03 Apr, 13:14 |
| Luciano Resende |
Re: Resumption of Weekly IRC ? |
Tue, 03 Apr, 21:17 |
| Jean-Sebastien Delfino |
Re: Resumption of Weekly IRC ? |
Wed, 04 Apr, 02:59 |
| kelvin goodson |
Re: Resumption of Weekly IRC ? |
Tue, 10 Apr, 10:47 |
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1144) Type Schema Location |
Tue, 03 Apr, 13:55 |
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1128) Support attribute and element with same name |
Tue, 03 Apr, 14:14 |
|
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1197) Sequence composition |
|
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1197) Sequence composition |
Tue, 03 Apr, 15:51 |
| Yang ZHONG (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1197) Sequence composition |
Tue, 03 Apr, 17:50 |
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1197) Sequence composition |
Wed, 04 Apr, 14:20 |
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1189) Remove workarounds after switching to EMF 2.3 |
Tue, 03 Apr, 16:27 |
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1109) TypeHelperImpl#getType(Class) queries wrong scope (EPackage.Registry.INSTANCE) and misses delegate scopes |
Tue, 03 Apr, 16:38 |
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1060) SDO Serialzation Failing in BigBank. |
Tue, 03 Apr, 16:42 |
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1023) WSDL <--> Java mapping: Define and document what WSDL styles are supported and not supported |
Tue, 03 Apr, 16:52 |
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1024) Define and document data binding for each WSDL <--> Java mapping |
Tue, 03 Apr, 17:06 |
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1021) CopyHelper and EqualityHelper should handle ChangeSummary |
Tue, 03 Apr, 17:10 |
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-889) Add a new codegen option to generate static SDO APIs using StAX parser |
Tue, 03 Apr, 17:16 |
|
Re: svn commit: r525225 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/modules/runtime-embedded: ./ src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/runtime/embedded/ src/test/java/calculator/ src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/api/ src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/container/ src/test/ja |
|
| Raymond Feng |
Re: svn commit: r525225 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/modules/runtime-embedded: ./ src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/runtime/embedded/ src/test/java/calculator/ src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/api/ src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/container/ src/test/ja |
Tue, 03 Apr, 18:16 |
| Raymond Feng |
Spin off the java component type |
Tue, 03 Apr, 18:16 |
| Luciano Resende |
Apache Tuscany Status page and mentors, was : Fwd: [RESULT] Adriano Crestani for Tuscany Committer |
Tue, 03 Apr, 20:39 |
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1200) Default HelperContext should provide automatic ClassLoader-specific scoping |
Tue, 03 Apr, 21:40 |
| Frank Budinsky (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1200) Default HelperContext should provide automatic ClassLoader-specific scoping |
Tue, 03 Apr, 21:42 |