Mailing-List: contact tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of scottkurz@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.226 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=MTEI0jd3ijLghj6FkickloT4Lf+gAVMLk3nQ+SH8xtLnSXfUbFuFilnjMp7bpEsPWYiDd/AWIfaqATEMFoY7OvCskzLnEjRSRevuhUBKTIF8ZNNY4qBkWYgzLisjLkj+SIn8tUcUHSz+MH3kh5nk/p7T+Ai0xyZfYpvN1Xh+14s=
Message-ID: <d4050d420704091126v4e6b8067g7810512caec06f46@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 14:26:24 -0400
From: "Scott Kurz" <scottkurz@gmail.com>
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Basic SDO question: no built-in types?
In-Reply-To: <429798.10974.qm@web611.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_6933_27390550.1176143184932"
References: <d4050d420704090811p497a5502m9e7493c72db2a69d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <429798.10974.qm@web611.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

------=_Part_6933_27390550.1176143184932
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Thanks Fuhwei, Frank that helps me under the SDO view of the built-in types.

I wonder how useful it would be to allow WSDL2Java to generate a Type, then,
instead of an int or String, when the "-dynamicSDO" option is chosen.

There would need to be some runtime databinding-sdo support for this option
too, I'd think.

Interesting but I'm probably going to drop this train of thought for now...

Scott

On 4/9/07, Fuhwei Lwo <fuhwei@bricemedia.com> wrote:
>
> Scott,
>
> SDO built-in types were defined in the sdoModel.xsd under
> tuscany/java/spec/sdo-api/src/main/resources/xml directory. The mapping from
> XSD to Java is described in the spec section 9.4.
>
> The instances of SDO built-in types will be instances of commonj.sdo.Type.
> So if you have a SDO type for xsd:int, the name of the commonj.sdo.Typeinstance will be "Int".
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Scott Kurz <scottkurz@gmail.com> wrote: This is maybe an SDO for dummies
> question.
>
> Are there any built-in SDO types, say, corresponding to  int which I can
> work with as a generic DataObject in the manner that java.lang.Integer is
> a
> java.lang.Object
> corresponding to int?  (I'm not seeing anything from a quick scan of the
> source or spec to suggest that there is.)
>
> Or is the simplest DataObject one can create a user-defined, complexType
> wrappering a single int?
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
>

------=_Part_6933_27390550.1176143184932--