tuscany-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Luciano Resende" <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Moving spec/sca-api module under sca? was: Build update
Date Thu, 05 Apr 2007 21:00:19 GMT
But we probably want to release 2 things, sca-spec and sca, right ? and then
in subsequent releases of sca, we are only going to release sca, unless the
spec changes and we need to  update sca-spec jar.

On 4/5/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <jsdelfino@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Raymond Feng wrote:
> > Good points. I agree it's probably better to keep it at sca/spec level.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raymond
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Venkata Krishnan"
> > <for.svkrish@gmail.com>
> > To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 10:15 AM
> > Subject: Re: Build update, was: SCA source tree and build structure
> >
> >
> >> Yes and I very faintly remember this to be the reason why we moved
> >> the specs
> >> out to where it is now. Isn't it ?
> >>
> >> - Venkat
> >>
> >> On 4/5/07, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I was under the impression that the spec-sca-api-r1.0 module would be
> a
> >>> stable one unless the spec changes. Isn't right that, under spec/ we
> >>> can
> >>> have multiple sca releases based on the same spec-sca-api-r1.0, but
> >>> moving
> >>> it to /modules we will be forced to have a spec api release every
> >>> time we
> >>> release sca ?
> >>>
> >>> On 4/5/07, Raymond Feng <enjoyjava@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > For SCA, I suggest that we further move it to >
> >>> "modules/spec-sca-api-r1.0
> >>> ".
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> > Raymond
> >>> >
> >>> > ----- Original Message -----
> >>> > From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <jsdelfino@apache.org>
> >>> > To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
> >>> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 8:36 AM
> >>> > Subject: Re: Build update, was: SCA source tree and build structure
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > > Bert Lamb wrote:
> >>> > >> Just to note, in order for this build to work from a fresh
empty
> >>> maven
> >>> > >> local repo, you'll need to run "mvn" from the > >>
> >>> /java/spec/sca-api-r1.0
> >>> /
> >>> > >> directory first.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> -Bert
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Good point. I had forgotten to commit my change to
> >>> java/sca/pom.xml > > to
> >>> > > include the spec-api in the top-down build. It's now fixed in
>
> >>> > revision
> >>> > > r525846.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Also, I'm not sure it's obvious to everybody that the SCA API
is
> >>> hiding
> >>> > > under java/spec instead of being under the java/sca folder.
> Similar
> >>> > > comment for the SDO API.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > How about moving java/spec/sca-api-r1.0 to java/sca and
> >>> > > java/spec/sdo-api to java/sdo as well?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Thoughts?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > --
> >>> > > Jean-Sebastien
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
>
> I could be convinced, but I'm not sure I understand yet :)
>
> Aren't we going to release an sca-api JAR in our next
> tuscany-incubating-xyz.tar.gz?
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message