tuscany-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Luciano Resende" <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: SCA source tree and build structure
Date Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:00:42 GMT
Sebastien wrote:
> I was initially thinking about 1.0-incubating-M3-SNAPSHOT, but alpha1 is
>probably better. I'll start with alpha1 then.

Should we leave like 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT, and only add M3 or alpha1 when
we branch/tag for release, together with the removal of SNAPSHOT ? This
would make trunk always with same version id, right ?

On 4/3/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <jsdelfino@apache.org> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> Raymond Feng wrote:
> > Forgot to ask one question:
> >
> > We have inconsistent version ids for artifacts in the trunk, do you
> > plan to reconcile them? If so, what should the version id look like? I
> > propose that we use something like 1.0-incubating-alpha1-SNAPSHOT to
> > reflect the fact that we're working toward a 1.0 release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raymond
> >
>
> Yes I plan to reconcile them, like this:
>
> >
> >> - Version of our modules will be specified once in java/sca/pom.xml,
> >> child poms don't need specify a version as they get it from their
> parent
> >>
>
> I was initially thinking about 1.0-incubating-M3-SNAPSHOT, but alpha1 is
> probably better. I'll start with alpha1 then.
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message