I can see that the renamed APIs would be more consistent across
Tuscany, which is an advantage. It is a matter of balancing this
against the work and disruption involved in making the change.
I don't feel strongly either way, but on balance I think it would
make sense to do this renaming either now or after the next release.
Simon
Raymond Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think a massive of package renaming is disturbing at this point. Since
> SDO and DAS already have the unique prefixes and there won't be any
> conflicts, I would suggest that we keep the short package name
> org.apache.tuscany for SCA.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "ant elder" <ant.elder@gmail.com>
> To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 12:59 AM
> Subject: Tuscany Java sca package names
>
>
>> The DAS and SDO sub projects use Java package names
>> org.apache.tuscany.dasand
>> org.apache.tuscany.sdo but the SCA sub project uses
>> org.apache.tuscany. As
>> the next release is attempting to stabilize all the externals I
>> wondered if
>> we should change this now to be be org.apache.tuscany.sca, does anyone
>> have
>> feelings either way?
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
|