Indeed :-)
I need to read over it a few more times, but
it seems like the prototype might be
a good testing fit for the RDB DAS as a
real validation / trial of the concept.
Cheers,
- Ole
Kevin Williams wrote:
> This looks interesting and I notice that they are addressing persistence
> from the start.
>
> On 4/30/07, Ole Ersoy <ole.ersoy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> This just came across the wire on the JUnit
>> mailing list.
>>
>> http://gtcgroup.com/soaj/Road.to.SOAj.html#AMT
>>
>> Here's a little excerpt:
>> ======================================================================
>> Hey, did you read that last bullet? It is a significant differentiator
>> between a "framework" and a "platform abstraction". Many frameworks
>> attempt to provide 100% functionality in a problem space. SOAj seeks to
>> support typical SOA capabilities.
>> ======================================================================
>>
>> The documentation has impressive depth.
>> Might be worth it for us to keep a close eye on this.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - Ole
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
|