tuscany-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Venkata Krishnan" <for.svkr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: SCA source tree and build structure
Date Wed, 04 Apr 2007 05:14:43 GMT
Hi,

Yes, what Luciano is suggesting here makes sense to me as well.

Thanks

- Venkat

On 4/4/07, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sebastien wrote:
> > I was initially thinking about 1.0-incubating-M3-SNAPSHOT, but alpha1 is
> >probably better. I'll start with alpha1 then.
>
> Should we leave like 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT, and only add M3 or alpha1
> when
> we branch/tag for release, together with the removal of SNAPSHOT ? This
> would make trunk always with same version id, right ?
>
> On 4/3/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <jsdelfino@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> > Raymond Feng wrote:
> > > Forgot to ask one question:
> > >
> > > We have inconsistent version ids for artifacts in the trunk, do you
> > > plan to reconcile them? If so, what should the version id look like? I
> > > propose that we use something like 1.0-incubating-alpha1-SNAPSHOT to
> > > reflect the fact that we're working toward a 1.0 release.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Raymond
> > >
> >
> > Yes I plan to reconcile them, like this:
> >
> > >
> > >> - Version of our modules will be specified once in java/sca/pom.xml,
> > >> child poms don't need specify a version as they get it from their
> > parent
> > >>
> >
> > I was initially thinking about 1.0-incubating-M3-SNAPSHOT, but alpha1 is
> > probably better. I'll start with alpha1 then.
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Sebastien
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message