Although I am not a committer, I fully support to release Java SDO because it's stable and
almost complete 2.1 spec implementation. Thanks.
+1
Fuhwei Lwo
Kevin Williams <kjwilliaster@gmail.com> wrote: A small nit. You first reference link
for [5] is to the version previously
named [M3].
Here is my +1
On 4/26/07, kelvin goodson wrote:
>
> Please vote to release the beta1 distribution of Tuscany SDO for Java
>
> The release candidate RC1 for Tuscany Java SDO beta1 archive distribution
> files are posted here at [1]
> The maven repository artifacts are posted in a staging repository [2]
> The release
> audit tool (rat) files and associated exceptions are attached to the jira
> under which the release work was done is at [3].
>
> The tag for the source code is at [4]
> Changes in this release are shown in
> [5]<
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubator-M3/sdo/distribution/RELEASE_NOTES.txt
> >
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/beta1/RC1/
> [2] http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/repo/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/
> [3] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171
> [4]
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubating-beta1/
> [5]
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubating-beta1/sdo/distribution/RELEASE_NOTES.txt
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Kelvin.
>
|