tuscany-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Venkata Krishnan" <for.svkr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Add "tuscany-" as the prefix for our artifact ids
Date Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:12:19 GMT
Hi,

Just prefixing 'tuscany-' may not be enough especially given the fact that
we have the sdo and das projects that use 'tuscany-sdo' and 'tuscany-das'
respectively.  So maybe we must make  'tuscany-sca' as prefix.

- Venkat

On 9/1/06, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've created an unassigned JIRA for this: TUSCANY-687. Do we really need a
> more detailed proposal over whats already been outlined in this thread?
> What
> is it we need to be careful about?
>
>    ...ant
>
> On 9/1/06, Jeremy Boynes <jboynes@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > I don't object in principle but think we should be careful - can you
> > post a proposal so we can all see.
> > --
> > Jeremy
> >
> > On Aug 31, 2006, at 11:30 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Did we conclude that we will rename the artifact ids as I proposed?
> > > If there's no objections, I'll make the changes.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Raymond
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "ant elder" <ant.elder@gmail.com>
> > > To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 2:28 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Add "tuscany-" as the prefix for our
> > > artifact ids
> > >
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> Rick also suggested this a while back, maybe we should raise a
> > >> JIRA this
> > >> time so its not forgotten.
> > >>
> > >>   ...ant
> > >>
> > >> On 8/25/06, Raymond Feng <enjoyjava@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> Here is a list of JARs we're building:
> > >>>
> > >>> axis2-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > >>> spring-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > >>> celtix-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > >>> groovy-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > >>> rmi-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > >>> api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > >>> core-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > >>> spi-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > >>> wsdl-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > >>>
> > >>> Don't we think the name of the jars are misleading? Can we tell
> > >>> these jars
> > >>> from tuscany project? The groupId makes them unique for the maven
> > >>> repository
> > >>> but it seems to be wierd when we copy these jars into some folders.
> > >>>
> > >>> I propose that we restore the naming convention we had in M1: add
> > >>> "tuscany-"
> > >>> as a prefix to the artifactId.
> > >>>
> > >>> Do you agree?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Raymond
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> -
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message