turbine-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <...@intermeta.de>
Subject Re: AW: Dependency hell in 2.4 (was AW: troubles migrating to tur
Date Mon, 09 Aug 2004 13:23:46 GMT
"Courcoux Peter, Slough" <Peter.Courcoux@anite.com> writes:

>Having done it a couple of times, I think turbine 2.3 --> turbine 2.4
>migration is pretty straight forward at present.

>Having spoken at length with Eric recently, we are both tending towards
>proposing Excalibur-Fortress as the default container for Avalon style
>components in turbine 2.4. If anyone has anything to contribute on this
>topic, please do so. It would be great to get opinions...

I don't know much about Avalon but as I can see, Excalibur is a very
limited container. Fortress was mentioned on avalon-dev as a good
container until the various flame wars and splits swamped the list and
made it unreadable.

So, yes, if it is not too much hassle, I would prefer Fortress over
Excalibur. But it should be your call.


Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen          INTERMETA GmbH
hps@intermeta.de        +49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/

RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for hire
   Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development

"Fighting for one's political stand is an honorable action, but re-
 fusing to acknowledge that there might be weaknesses in one's
 position - in order to identify them so that they can be remedied -
 is a large enough problem with the Open Source movement that it
 deserves to be on this list of the top five problems."
                       -- Michelle Levesque, "Fundamental Issues with
                                    Open Source Software Development"

To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-user-help@jakarta.apache.org

View raw message