Hi,
In my case, i want to use trafficserver as a cache proxy; so my application is
configured to get data from the server A if no cluster situation. But i'm
wondering if it will still works well in the cluster.
You memtioned load-bancing, so does it need a load bance between
my application and trafficserver cluster? Or should i deal with it in my
application?
Yeah, maybe both are fine, anyway, i want my model be as simple as
possible. Any suggestions about this?
Thanks!
2015-07-29
hzwulibin
发件人：Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
发送时间：2015-07-28 19:34
主题：Re: What's the common usecase of TrafficServer Cluster
收件人："users"<users@trafficserver.apache.org>
抄送：
Am 28.07.2015 um 13:22 schrieb hzwulibin:
> Hi, everyone
> Today i setup the TrafficServer cluster. However, i have some questions.
> How the cluster supply the service to the client, do we need other
> solftware like nginx or haproxy?
> Just want to know the most common usecase!
> In my thinking now, for example, there are three nodes in the clustre A,
> B, C;
> Some clients configed to use A, when A is down, those clients lost the
> service.
> So the clients should config to use all ip of A, B, C, or need a medial
> solftware like nginx?
> Can anyone say some common usecase here?
i don't get "Some clients configed to use A"
normally you have an A record returning 3 IP's for load-balancing and
nginx don't make sense in the picture because it plays on the same level
as ATS itself: a proxy |