Mailing-List: contact users-help@trafficserver.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@trafficserver.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
Subject: Re: ATS 6.0 Logging Question
From: Leif Hedstrom <zwoop@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALKvBna388A9rW93CYO8cgZds1QDoiD1ZuBVnWRJy9f0Y8wGQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:46:51 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <46C033BF-950C-4DB4-AB7E-1DE43AA4D504@apache.org>
References: 
 <CALKvBna388A9rW93CYO8cgZds1QDoiD1ZuBVnWRJy9f0Y8wGQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@trafficserver.apache.org


> On Jun 30, 2015, at 5:53 AM, Adam W. Dace <colonelforbin74@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> First, let me say the new logging regime is looking good.  Really =
good.  I've had quite the fun time defining my own logging format and it =
seems to be working quite well.
>=20
> The only thing I miss at all about the old logging system was the idea =
that errors get logged into a different file.
>=20
> Is there any way to do this in the new regime?  I'm guessing not but I =
wanted to just ask.


That should still be the case. Does it not do that? If so, we have a =
serious problem. The =E2=80=9Cnew regime=E2=80=9D is not that new, we =
simply removed the hardcoded formats (and related records.config =
settings), and moved them all to the XML config file. The error log =
should not have changed.

=E2=80=94 Leif